Quote (Hamsterbaby @ Nov 24 2022 09:19pm)
Put it this way.
It is not Russia and it is not USA ( Directly ) , but still not USA. That is definite .
Based on what evidence?
I know that the factual truth isn't always as important as the narrative, but its always interesting

Quote (Vastet @ Nov 24 2022 09:23pm)
I'd say it wouldn't be. Even explosives exclusively manufactured by a specific and well tracked supplier aren't immune from being acquired by an agent otherwise not entitled to them, and indeed any such evidence would be extraordinarily suspicious specifically because such explosives would never be used in a clandestine operation unless the whole point of using them was to blame a power innocent of the sabotage. I'll be suspicious of any evidence at the scene which is claimed to demonstrate the culprit, no matter who is blamed for it.
Exactly.