Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ 14 Mar 2022 22:13)
By which you mean doing nothing to prevent it and actively supplying the weapons that allow it to happen.
There was nothing the U.S. could have done at the start of the war in Yemen to prevent it. What did you expect, that the U.S. aggressively positions itself against SA from the get go? Doing that would have risked a century old alliance, diminished U.S. influence in the Middle East and undermined their influence on the informal leader and most important singular member of OPEC (an org whose decisions have outsized influence on the domestic and global economy).
Also, it's not like Saudi Arabia would have been unable to buy the weapons for this war from someone else. This war would still have happened without U.S. arms sales to SA...
Here's a good breakdown of the U.S. position on the war in Yemen from one of the world's most reputable think tanks:
https://carnegieendowment.org/sada/84326- in the beginning, Obama and Congress approved arms sales, operational support and also embraced the Saudi narrative on the war
- over time, their stance grew sour, by the end of his term, Obama suspended an arms sale
- Trump reapproved this arms sale and started a rapproachement with Saudi Arabia (which further down the line led to historical peace treaties between Isreal, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and others)
- during Trump's presidency, his stance on the war became more tacit, he tried to rein in the Saudis' worst impulses, for example he called on them to lift a sea blockade of Yemen and directed U.S. intelligence to assist in avoiding civil casualties as much as possible. (To be fair though, this might have been due to mounting pressure at home, rather than a genuine change of heart by Trump.)
- in 2019, bipartisan legislation passed Congress (initiated by Senate Republicans!) calling for an end to the war
- in 2021, Biden declared an end to U.S. support for offensive operations, including arms sales
As the author of that article concludes:
Quote
Biden’s Yemen decisions do not constitute a rupture with his predecessors, but rather represent another step further in the gradual shift of the U.S. position from supporting the Arab coalition in the war to merely brokering a peace initiative.
So, the U.S. unequivocally sided with the Saudis for less than 2 of the 7 years that this war has been going on, have gradually shifted away from their pro-Saudi position toward a more neutral role and have indeed only been supporting the war with varying degrees of reluctance during the time in between. The way I characterized it in my previous post is surely not perfect, but all in all seems rather fair and accurate.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Mar 14 2022 07:24pm