d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Jan 6 Committee Thread
Prev1171172173174175225Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 46,960
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jul 12 2022 05:57pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Jul 12 2022 02:12pm)
So trumps personal lawyer states there was no election fraud
And also states he told Trump this over and over. Told him to concede election
Another Soros Paul shill?


election fraud is obvious. why do you fall all over what some lawyer say?? when did what a lawyer says become gold? yea hes a sell out nothing new in covidiot world. hey ev1 some lawyer says election was legit CHHEEEEEEEEEEET..............

2000 Mules (2022) Full film HD
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5SNneqe2Rqq0/

Who gave the order for vote counting to stop on Nov 3, 2020? 11.03.21
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jo70PgHrUjUY/
Member
Posts: 27,048
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 14,569.69
Jul 12 2022 06:16pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Jul 12 2022 04:57pm)
election fraud is obvious. why do you fall all over what some lawyer say?? when did what a lawyer says become gold? yea hes a sell out nothing new in covidiot world. hey ev1 some lawyer says election was legit CHHEEEEEEEEEEET..............

2000 Mules (2022) Full film HD
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5SNneqe2Rqq0/

Who gave the order for vote counting to stop on Nov 3, 2020? 11.03.21
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jo70PgHrUjUY/



Lol Trumps actual personal circle says otherwise.
Cope harder cultist
Member
Posts: 46,960
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jul 12 2022 06:18pm
Quote (theCrossbones @ Jul 12 2022 05:16pm)
Lol Trumps actual personal circle says otherwise.
Cope harder cultist


in your face duped one

2000 Mules (2022) Full film HD
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5SNneqe2Rqq0/

Who gave the order for vote counting to stop on Nov 3, 2020? 11.03.21
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jo70PgHrUjUY/
Member
Posts: 50,759
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,146.00
Jul 13 2022 11:10pm
So what exactly is this story with this Ray Epps guy?

The NYT and other corporate media are suddenly writing puff pieces about how he's a victim and being defamed by people claiming he's a glowie
He's on video the day before the riot, directing people to the capitol and telling them to storm it, telling them to go into the capitol, loudly shouting to the crowd to riot and enter the capitol, very clearly leading the mob. He's just marching around telling people to go into the capitol nonstop, drove across the country to be there but didn't attend Trump's speech, only went into the mobs. On video you can actually see people booing and saying 'what?' 'noooo' when he tells them to go into the capitol and start chanting 'fed' and calling him out as a glowie- on the day of the riot. He's on video at the barricades instigating the violence as the crowd pushed into the officers at the moment the riot started, he's seen pushing the large Trump flag over the barricades and initiating the immediate conflict. And conspicuously he faces no charges and no investigation, wasn't arrested. When Ted Cruz directly asked the FBI during a senate hearing whether he was a federal agent, the FBI refused to answer. Over and over again, they refuse to comment on him. They refused FOIA requests on why he was removed from the wanted list. He's probably the single person for which the most evidence of insurrection and conspiracy exists, but doesn't get charged.

The same people who wrote the NYT puff piece today on Ray Epps calling it 'conspiracy theories' about him, are the same ones who previously penned a documentary for the NYT citing Ray Epps as their evidence of a conspiracy to storm the capitol based on the videos of him directing people to the capitol. And naturally, the NYT and NY FBI offices are basically joined at the hip at this point (look at the project veritas raid and many other stories), so the fact that the NYT is running cover for the FBI just makes it all the more damning. So either the NYT and FBI are engaging in the most clumsy and transparent coverup and trying to tell people not to believe their lying eyes, or the Epps guy is just magically immune to the reach of the January 6th investigators who have brought conspiracy and sedition charges against people who weren't even present and didn't even direct the riot at all, even though this guy is on video repeatedly instigating the violence and calling for a riot.
Member
Posts: 46,960
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jul 13 2022 11:20pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jul 13 2022 10:10pm)
So what exactly is this story with this Ray Epps guy?

The NYT and other corporate media are suddenly writing puff pieces about how he's a victim and being defamed by people claiming he's a glowie
He's on video the day before the riot, directing people to the capitol and telling them to storm it, telling them to go into the capitol, loudly shouting to the crowd to riot and enter the capitol, very clearly leading the mob. He's just marching around telling people to go into the capitol nonstop, drove across the country to be there but didn't attend Trump's speech, only went into the mobs. On video you can actually see people booing and saying 'what?' 'noooo' when he tells them to go into the capitol and start chanting 'fed' and calling him out as a glowie- on the day of the riot. He's on video at the barricades instigating the violence as the crowd pushed into the officers at the moment the riot started, he's seen pushing the large Trump flag over the barricades and initiating the immediate conflict. And conspicuously he faces no charges and no investigation, wasn't arrested. When Ted Cruz directly asked the FBI during a senate hearing whether he was a federal agent, the FBI refused to answer. Over and over again, they refuse to comment on him. They refused FOIA requests on why he was removed from the wanted list. He's probably the single person for which the most evidence of insurrection and conspiracy exists, but doesn't get charged.

The same people who wrote the NYT puff piece today on Ray Epps calling it 'conspiracy theories' about him, are the same ones who previously penned a documentary for the NYT citing Ray Epps as their evidence of a conspiracy to storm the capitol based on the videos of him directing people to the capitol. And naturally, the NYT and NY FBI offices are basically joined at the hip at this point (look at the project veritas raid and many other stories), so the fact that the NYT is running cover for the FBI just makes it all the more damning. So either the NYT and FBI are engaging in the most clumsy and transparent coverup and trying to tell people not to believe their lying eyes, or the Epps guy is just magically immune to the reach of the January 6th investigators who have brought conspiracy and sedition charges against people who weren't even present and didn't even direct the riot at all, even though this guy is on video repeatedly instigating the violence and calling for a riot.


how about john sullivan aka jayden x
how come not even a peep about that dude. hell he even filmed himself committing actual crimes. maybe because his dad is a spook?

what spook means
spook
/spo͞ok/
noun
noun: spook; plural noun: spooks

1.
informal
a ghost.
2.
informal•North American
a spy.
"a CIA spook"


and not what fraud lefties really want it to mean hell fraud lefties want ok sigh to mean whyte power. fraud lefties all about racism
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Jul 14 2022 12:31am
Quote (Goomshill @ Jul 13 2022 10:10pm)
So what exactly is this story with this Ray Epps guy?

The NYT and other corporate media are suddenly writing puff pieces about how he's a victim and being defamed by people claiming he's a glowie
He's on video the day before the riot, directing people to the capitol and telling them to storm it, telling them to go into the capitol, loudly shouting to the crowd to riot and enter the capitol, very clearly leading the mob. He's just marching around telling people to go into the capitol nonstop, drove across the country to be there but didn't attend Trump's speech, only went into the mobs. On video you can actually see people booing and saying 'what?' 'noooo' when he tells them to go into the capitol and start chanting 'fed' and calling him out as a glowie- on the day of the riot. He's on video at the barricades instigating the violence as the crowd pushed into the officers at the moment the riot started, he's seen pushing the large Trump flag over the barricades and initiating the immediate conflict. And conspicuously he faces no charges and no investigation, wasn't arrested. When Ted Cruz directly asked the FBI during a senate hearing whether he was a federal agent, the FBI refused to answer. Over and over again, they refuse to comment on him. They refused FOIA requests on why he was removed from the wanted list. He's probably the single person for which the most evidence of insurrection and conspiracy exists, but doesn't get charged.

The same people who wrote the NYT puff piece today on Ray Epps calling it 'conspiracy theories' about him, are the same ones who previously penned a documentary for the NYT citing Ray Epps as their evidence of a conspiracy to storm the capitol based on the videos of him directing people to the capitol. And naturally, the NYT and NY FBI offices are basically joined at the hip at this point (look at the project veritas raid and many other stories), so the fact that the NYT is running cover for the FBI just makes it all the more damning. So either the NYT and FBI are engaging in the most clumsy and transparent coverup and trying to tell people not to believe their lying eyes, or the Epps guy is just magically immune to the reach of the January 6th investigators who have brought conspiracy and sedition charges against people who weren't even present and didn't even direct the riot at all, even though this guy is on video repeatedly instigating the violence and calling for a riot.


Many, if not all of your questions, are answered in the NYT article. Do you need me to link it for you?
Member
Posts: 27,144
Joined: Mar 11 2016
Gold: 9.77
Warn: 10%
Jul 14 2022 12:47am
Member
Posts: 46,960
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Jul 14 2022 01:01am
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 13 2022 11:31pm)
Many, if not all of your questions, are answered in the NYT article. Do you need me to link it for you?


why dont you answer it?
Member
Posts: 50,759
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,146.00
Jul 14 2022 01:26am
Quote (thundercock @ Jul 14 2022 01:31am)
Many, if not all of your questions, are answered in the NYT article. Do you need me to link it for you?


The NYT doesn't answer the fundamental question of how he can be the single most visible insurrectionist, crossing the barricades, participating in the violence and coordinating the riot- and not get charged.
Saying "he talked to the FBI" isn't an answer to that. Nor is pretending he was 'calling for calm' while he was so blatantly trying to agitate the crowd that the crowd was dismissing him as a glowie.
The standard for prosecuting everyone else has been far far lower. Including people who weren't even involved in the riot, people who weren't even present.

If he's not an FBI informant / paid operative / agent provocateur, then he clearly deserves to be prosecuted for instigating a riot. Attacking police, riling up a crowd, telling them to go into the capitol? If anyone's singular conduct holds any of the diffuse responsibility for the people who died that day, it would be him. And why would the NYT and rest of the liberal media be throwing in their support behind one of the insurrectionists in the first place? They've called for people to be prosecuted for conspiracy to overthrow the government, and he's on video actively conspiring to overthrow the government, so what is it, is he an insurrectionist or is he a glowie?
Member
Posts: 4,040
Joined: Oct 28 2009
Gold: 112,082.21
Jul 14 2022 01:36am
Quote (Crunkt @ Jul 14 2022 02:47am)


you need better heroes m8.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1171172173174175225Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll