Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 16 2022 01:41pm)
But how do you get the country which just used a nuclear first strike to stop if you give them what they want and back off? How do you disincentivize this behavior if there is no punishment and the nuclear first strike effectively leads to them having free reign on the battlefield?
The only non-military solution that I see would be if the entire rest of the world comes together to slap total economic sanctions on them - but what do you do if the Chinese don't play along and take the bite out of the sanctions?
We get them to stop by compromise. We compromise so it never gets to the point to even have the initial nuke dropped, so that way humanity wins. When the wests official stance that all of Ukraine including Crimea needs to be returned for peace talks to happen, it's a non-starter and just shows how little we care about getting peace. We want to give Russia the Germany WW1 treatment and are acting all surprised why it's not sticking.
Quote (Santara @ Nov 16 2022 01:52pm)
Could you be any more naïve?
If the world fails to forcefully react to nuclear provocation, it invites more nuclear provocation. The immediate thought isn't "hey, let's stop helping Ukraine defend itself," it's "we have to make sure they never try this shit again."
Could you?
This same logic was used to justify Iraq, Afghanistan and dozens of other of interventions. Replaces nuke with WMD, Assad chemical weapons, fill in the blank. What has forceful responses begotten us in the last 30 years? I guess in 2022 some libertarian purist doctrines like being anti-war get thrown out the window because this time its different right?
This post was edited by ofthevoid on Nov 16 2022 01:27pm