d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1168016811682168316845001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 28,880
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Nov 16 2022 12:31pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 16 2022 01:14pm)
1. There is a huge difference, in terms of escalation, between using tactical nukes on a third country, and using strategic nukes against NATO cities.
2. Your logic implies that the use of nukes as an offensive weapon is an "I-win-card" for any nuclear power fighting against a non-nuclear country. That's obviously a precedent the rest of the world cannot accept.


No my logic implies that detonating a nuke would be such a huge event that the whole world would stand still and not look to antagonize but rather look to stop hostilities immediately and find some way to not see another one dropped. I can't even fathom what our world look after that. At that point it's not about winning or losing, the framing of the discussion would be completely different. If I'm an American, German, or French man, my immediate thought would be omfg we need to stop immediately not hey lets go send our armies to punish Russia for doing this. The latter logic whether you want to frame it as righteous indignation or whatever would be irrelevant. What would be most relevant to non-psychopaths is what do we do and how do we respond to not have a nuke dropped on Berlin or Paris or anywhere else. Because at the end of the day that's what people care about, and if a country is so unhinged and so threatened that they are starting to use nukes, then i'd rather be an adult and not antagonize the crazies but de-escalate.

This post was edited by ofthevoid on Nov 16 2022 12:32pm
Member
Posts: 92,984
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Nov 16 2022 12:38pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Nov 16 2022 01:31pm)
No my logic implies that detonating a nuke would be such a huge event that the whole world would stand still and not look to antagonize but rather look to stop hostilities immediately and find some way to not see another one dropped. I can't even fathom what our world look after that. At that point it's not about winning or losing, the framing of the discussion would be completely different. If I'm an American, German, or French man, my immediate thought would be omfg we need to stop immediately not hey lets go send our armies to punish Russia for doing this. The latter logic whether you want to frame it as righteous indignation or whatever would be irrelevant. What would be most relevant to non-psychopaths is what do we do and how do we respond to not have a nuke dropped on Berlin or Paris or anywhere else. Because at the end of the day that's what people care about, and if a country is so unhinged and so threatened that they are starting to use nukes, then i'd rather be an adult and not antagonize the crazies but de-escalate.


the logical answer is starve them. close all pipelines and put north korea level embargoes on all russian goods to the west. and deal with the consequences of that as they come.
Member
Posts: 54,153
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Nov 16 2022 12:41pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ 16 Nov 2022 19:31)
No my logic implies that detonating a nuke would be such a huge event that the whole world would stand still and not look to antagonize but rather look to stop hostilities immediately and find some way to not see another one dropped. I can't even fathom what our world look after that. At that point it's not about winning or losing, the framing of the discussion would be completely different. If I'm an American, German, or French man, my immediate thought would be omfg we need to stop immediately not hey lets go send our armies to punish Russia for doing this. The latter logic whether you want to frame it as righteous indignation or whatever would be irrelevant. What would be most relevant to non-psychopaths is what do we do and how do we respond to not have a nuke dropped on Berlin or Paris or anywhere else. Because at the end of the day that's what people care about, and if a country is so unhinged and so threatened that they are starting to use nukes, then i'd rather be an adult and not antagonize the crazies but de-escalate.


But how do you get the country which just used a nuclear first strike to stop if you give them what they want and back off? How do you disincentivize this behavior if there is no punishment and the nuclear first strike effectively leads to them having free reign on the battlefield?

The only non-military solution that I see would be if the entire rest of the world comes together to slap total economic sanctions on them - but what do you do if the Chinese don't play along and take the bite out of the sanctions?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 16 2022 12:41pm
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Nov 16 2022 12:51pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 16 2022 02:26pm)
No one fucking said that. Learn to fucking read


Calm down Sun Tzu, I apologize for questioning your military brilliance okay?

Lmao fkn moron
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 16 2022 12:52pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ Nov 16 2022 12:31pm)
No my logic implies that detonating a nuke would be such a huge event that the whole world would stand still and not look to antagonize but rather look to stop hostilities immediately and find some way to not see another one dropped. I can't even fathom what our world look after that. At that point it's not about winning or losing, the framing of the discussion would be completely different. If I'm an American, German, or French man, my immediate thought would be omfg we need to stop immediately not hey lets go send our armies to punish Russia for doing this. The latter logic whether you want to frame it as righteous indignation or whatever would be irrelevant. What would be most relevant to non-psychopaths is what do we do and how do we respond to not have a nuke dropped on Berlin or Paris or anywhere else. Because at the end of the day that's what people care about, and if a country is so unhinged and so threatened that they are starting to use nukes, then i'd rather be an adult and not antagonize the crazies but de-escalate.


Could you be any more naïve?

If the world fails to forcefully react to nuclear provocation, it invites more nuclear provocation. The immediate thought isn't "hey, let's stop helping Ukraine defend itself," it's "we have to make sure they never try this shit again."
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 16 2022 12:55pm
This post is a violation of the site rules and appropriate action was taken.

Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Nov 16 2022 12:51pm)
Calm down Sun Tzu, I apologize for questioning your military brilliance okay?

Lmao fkn moron


You're the one here who said retarded shit, and when you get called on saying retarded shit, call other people morons? Get the fuck outta here, your extra chromosome is showing.
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Nov 16 2022 12:56pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 16 2022 02:55pm)
You're the one here who said retarded shit, and when you get called on saying retarded shit, call other people morons? Get the fuck outta here, your extra chromosome is showing.


Are you okay you seem emotional lmao
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 16 2022 12:57pm
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Nov 16 2022 12:56pm)
Are you okay you seem emotional lmao


I have a low tolerance for stupidity. It's on display a lot these days.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Nov 16 2022 12:59pm
Quote (ofthevoid @ 16 Nov 2022 19:31)
No my logic implies that detonating a nuke would be such a huge event that the whole world would stand still and not look to antagonize but rather look to stop hostilities immediately and find some way to not see another one dropped. I can't even fathom what our world look after that. At that point it's not about winning or losing, the framing of the discussion would be completely different. If I'm an American, German, or French man, my immediate thought would be omfg we need to stop immediately not hey lets go send our armies to punish Russia for doing this. The latter logic whether you want to frame it as righteous indignation or whatever would be irrelevant. What would be most relevant to non-psychopaths is what do we do and how do we respond to not have a nuke dropped on Berlin or Paris or anywhere else. Because at the end of the day that's what people care about, and if a country is so unhinged and so threatened that they are starting to use nukes, then i'd rather be an adult and not antagonize the crazies but de-escalate.


You are going against the principles and foreign trait of your own culture and country.
Never US would accept Russia and indirectly the EAST block to own the place with 1 nuke.
Along with all EU countries that would engage more or less slowly.


On a country who agressed no one, lets not forget this.
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Nov 16 2022 01:02pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 16 2022 02:57pm)
I have a low tolerance for stupidity. It's on display a lot these days.


How dare people disturb this venerable institution of reason and debate with stupidity!

I apologize profusely, please continue your reasonable discussion on the antinuclear properties of the Ukrainian army.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1168016811682168316845001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll