d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1161916201621162216235001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 39,720
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Nov 9 2022 03:38pm
Quote (vonvon @ 10 Nov 2022 00:25)
Yes same here for national park but they're everywhere here
We do have a lot of non park wood here that we can hunt
We do have law for gun to
You need paper and safety training lock ect.
Kind of look similar to you
We apply for a licence and you get like 1 chance out of 10 to be allowed


I never tried a moose (dunno, I just can't kill a God's creature that tries to make friends and is so open to humans), but tried a deer. Couldn't say they are tasty. Prefer beef.
Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 9 2022 03:58pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 9 2022 12:53pm)
Sure they do. Yesterday, Russia fired about 20,000 to Ukraine's 7,000 rounds. But artillery aren't the only weapons, and to take ground, you must expose troops to fire to cover that ground. Russia has been hurling human waves at the Bakhmut front, hurled huge numbers of troops at Sievierodonetsk, and lost large numbers in the early stages in mad dashes for land grabs. Tell me how it is that Russian soldiers, who enjoy a significant advantage in artillery, consistently refuse to join attacks on Ukrainian lines, if artillery is deciding the war. Well, I'm here to help! There's all the difference in the world between lobbing shells at troops hunkered down in bunkers, and lobbing shells at above-ground attack formations.

Russians haven't been "hurling soldiers" at anything. When they do, and take losses, what do you see? A complete meltdown on the Russian side of the commentariat and endless streams of jizz from the Ukrainian side, like we recently saw in Pavlovka. Conversely, Those sorts of losses are so normal for the Ukrainian side that it barely gets any sort of notification.

Russians are just doing what they always do: bomb until the enemy line is depleted, then move in. Danger? Withdraw while bombing the enemy.

And that's the critical factor, even more-so than the artillery disadvantage - faced with strong enemy advances Russians withdraw, Ukrainians cling. Today it was a big one with Kherson, before that it was Lyman.

Quote (Santara @ Nov 9 2022 12:53pm)
Are more Ukrainians likely being killed in the war overall? I think so. At a 5-1 ratio (your last assessment was 10-1)? Unlikely.

Earlier I said "perhaps" 10:1, now I'm saying "minimum" 5:1. Things have changed, the Russians are more on the offensive now and, unlike some here, I am open to the idea that things can get worse for the side I'm cheering on.

And so are you, it seems, since you've switched from saying a lopsided Russian advantage is delusional or ridiculous or whatever particular word to a mere "unlikely". Glad you're coming around.

Quote (Norlander @ Nov 9 2022 01:38pm)
I never tried a moose (dunno, I just can't kill a God's creature that tries to make friends and is so open to humans), but tried a deer. Couldn't say they are tasty. Prefer beef.

Moose is good, elk is the true king of game meat.

This post was edited by kusotarre1 on Nov 9 2022 04:00pm
Member
Posts: 4,349
Joined: Mar 7 2020
Gold: 130.00
Nov 9 2022 04:21pm
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Nov 9 2022 10:58pm)
Russians haven't been "hurling soldiers" at anything. When they do, and take losses, what do you see? A complete meltdown on the Russian side of the commentariat and endless streams of jizz from the Ukrainian side, like we recently saw in Pavlovka. Conversely, Those sorts of losses are so normal for the Ukrainian side that it barely gets any sort of notification.

Russians are just doing what they always do: bomb until the enemy line is depleted, then move in. Danger? Withdraw while bombing the enemy.

And that's the critical factor, even more-so than the artillery disadvantage - faced with strong enemy advances Russians withdraw, Ukrainians cling. Today it was a big one with Kherson, before that it was Lyman.


Earlier I said "perhaps" 10:1, now I'm saying "minimum" 5:1. Things have changed, the Russians are more on the offensive now and, unlike some here, I am open to the idea that things can get worse for the side I'm cheering on.

And so are you, it seems, since you've switched from saying a lopsided Russian advantage is delusional or ridiculous or whatever particular word to a mere "unlikely". Glad you're coming around.


Moose is good, elk is the true king of game meat.


The whole narrative will be written in the books of star trek school on mars in the year 2145 calling this war a strategic chess play russia lead. Just wait and see. Although I hate war on both sides of this conflict but the old generals in Russia sure know how to make war. The U.S is not the only country who has the know how.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Nov 9 2022 04:47pm
Jesus, Russians have no chance against these guys. Only nuclear threats.




Russian units undergoing training in the area of ​​the city of Baranovichi, Brest region, were issued obsolete weapons and property – metal helmets of the Second World War model and means of protection from the period of the 60-70 years of the last century. In addition, a large part of small arms, namely AK-74 assault rifles, are in non-working condition due to poor storage conditions.
According to detailed information, the Russian occupiers are taking away looted property and stolen cars from the city of Severodonetsk, Luhansk region. Looting takes place under cover and accompanied by representatives of the occupation’s so-called state security agencies.

This post was edited by Meanwhile on Nov 9 2022 04:49pm
Member
Posts: 39,720
Joined: Nov 16 2005
Gold: 13.37
Nov 9 2022 04:50pm
Quote (kusotarre1 @ 10 Nov 2022 00:58)
Russians haven't been "hurling soldiers" at anything. When they do, and take losses, what do you see? A complete meltdown on the Russian side of the commentariat and endless streams of jizz from the Ukrainian side, like we recently saw in Pavlovka. Conversely, Those sorts of losses are so normal for the Ukrainian side that it barely gets any sort of notification.

Russians are just doing what they always do: bomb until the enemy line is depleted, then move in. Danger? Withdraw while bombing the enemy.

And that's the critical factor, even more-so than the artillery disadvantage - faced with strong enemy advances Russians withdraw, Ukrainians cling. Today it was a big one with Kherson, before that it was Lyman.


Earlier I said "perhaps" 10:1, now I'm saying "minimum" 5:1. Things have changed, the Russians are more on the offensive now and, unlike some here, I am open to the idea that things can get worse for the side I'm cheering on.

And so are you, it seems, since you've switched from saying a lopsided Russian advantage is delusional or ridiculous or whatever particular word to a mere "unlikely". Glad you're coming around.


Moose is good, elk is the true king of game meat.


Me English nicht verstein, I thought moose and elk are the same.

This post was edited by Norlander on Nov 9 2022 04:50pm
Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 9 2022 05:10pm
Quote (Norlander @ Nov 9 2022 02:50pm)
Me English nicht verstein, I thought moose and elk are the same.

Moose have flat antlers, elk have pointy ones.
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 9 2022 05:42pm
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Nov 9 2022 03:58pm)
Russians haven't been "hurling soldiers" at anything. When they do, and take losses, what do you see? A complete meltdown on the Russian side of the commentariat and endless streams of jizz from the Ukrainian side, like we recently saw in Pavlovka. Conversely, Those sorts of losses are so normal for the Ukrainian side that it barely gets any sort of notification.

Russians are just doing what they always do: bomb until the enemy line is depleted, then move in. Danger? Withdraw while bombing the enemy.

And that's the critical factor, even more-so than the artillery disadvantage - faced with strong enemy advances Russians withdraw, Ukrainians cling. Today it was a big one with Kherson, before that it was Lyman.


Earlier I said "perhaps" 10:1, now I'm saying "minimum" 5:1. Things have changed, the Russians are more on the offensive now and, unlike some here, I am open to the idea that things can get worse for the side I'm cheering on.

And so are you, it seems, since you've switched from saying a lopsided Russian advantage is delusional or ridiculous or whatever particular word to a mere "unlikely". Glad you're coming around.


I don't spend a lot of time perusing the commentariat, nor do I care to seek some middle ground here on "what the casualties are." A lot of people are dead, and it's Russia's fault.

Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 9 2022 05:44pm
Quote (Santara @ Nov 9 2022 03:42pm)
I don't spend a lot of time perusing the commentariat, nor do I care to seek some middle ground here on "what the casualties are." A lot of people are dead, and it's Russia's fault.

I agree. If they had have been much more brutal early on, a lot of lives would have been saved. Should've opened with a cruise missile directly into the Rada.
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Nov 9 2022 05:48pm
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Nov 9 2022 05:44pm)
I agree. If they had have been much more brutal early on, a lot of lives would have been saved. Should've opened with a cruise missile directly into the Rada.


*should've stayed in their own country*
Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 9 2022 06:17pm
They tried, but you know this. Or at least are aware of what I'm gonna say about Minsk and such.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1161916201621162216235001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll