Quote (Santara @ Nov 8 2022 07:33pm)
The sources were RU telegram
RU telegram is the best place to learn about RU failures, for two reasons.
First, they're doomers. They see a small failure and bitch and cry for hours. UA telegram provides that in inverse.
Second, they correct, because they have to struggle with the desire to balance doomerism with nationalism.
UA TG doesn't have this dialectic, because they (correctly) view positive news as beneficial to the war effort due to Western amplification of positive news and therefore more Western weapons shipments.
Quote (Santara @ Nov 8 2022 07:33pm)
You're literally using whataboutism while accusing me of it. The US has neither the obligation, nor the inclination to halt NATO expansion (even if I think it should be disbanded). And that's what this is about: NATO expansion, not any of the litany of things you want to use to characterize US policy on.
The point is there is no such thing as whataboutism. It's a neural hack to stub off learning.
You posit that the US doesn't need to implement the NATO freeze because they aren't legally obligated to. But the US isn't legally obligated to implement
anything because America is a hegemonic power. And history clearly shows this is true.
Without 'whataboutism', you have to confront this contradiction and reconcile it. Therefore, 'whataboutism' is an ideological defense mechanism used to avoid this reconciliation.
Without it, the solution is obvious: power determines rules.
And honestly, why do you even care, since you think America is winning? That America will continue to win?
This post was edited by kusotarre1 on Nov 8 2022 09:49pm