The left have completely lost their minds when it comes to things like Gender & drag shows for kids & it is fucking hilarious to watch.

Well, I apologize for not seeing your sincerity. I am perhaps biased/conditioned to the lack thereof due to the way other people show up on this forum.

Can you give an example of what you've "seen at book readings"?

Sexual abuse is a loose term though. It’s not just rape and touching.

Many states don’t allow women to be topless at clubs. It is still a sexualized performance despite being partially clothed. Many would deem it abusive to bring a child to see.

defending a tranny twerking for kids ?

France uncovered 300k abused kids hetween 1950 snd 2020 and the abusers were actively defended.

Literally more abuse in one country than anybody could ever hope to catalog from the lgbtq licensure

obligatory: i havent physically been to any, i'm just reading second hand.

I think the issue is mostly a problem of presenting evidence to minds that aren't even able to comprehend it with very little room for a counter argument. like am i a person who thinks that "there are only 2 genders" or "be proud to be white" narratives hold water? no, they're a reaction and largely as or more toxic. but the idea that you can't EVER publicly present them while the other side can is problematic. presenting ideas of gender fluidity to young children at all to me is an issue, mostly just due to statistics. even VERY optimistic studies show that maybe 1/100 kids are trans. so why present the evidence to a whole range of children? especially at ages they aren't able to take it in? better imo to identify cases and deal with them individually. along the same vein is the books in libraries about masturbation or sexual exploration. sure, all kids do it, but i dont see a reason for that to ever be a publicly available book. its a footnote in the yearly sex ed program and beyond that leave it up to parents.



it shouldn't be tho, at all.

i'm sure if i loosely defined someone as a racist you'd be quite upset, because you understand the social stigma that places on them.

we live in a society that loosely defines stigmatizing terms for weaponization, and that's lowbrow thinking that will come for us all in the end. good luck explaining that you're not a "sexual abuser of children" after you get called that because you took off your top at a public beach with children present.

this behavior isn't even by-and-large illegal. we shouldn't apply a term with that level of recourse to something that is legal in most states.

This is Big Boomer Energy. Who is finding out about masturbation and sex via books these days?

216k, not 300.

In 70 years, there would have been around 3000 sexual predatory priests.

This Inserm study, of national scope, also estimates that 5.5 million people in France would have been victims of sexual abuse before their majority.
Sexual violence committed in the Church would thus represent 4% of all violence of this type in French society, on average from 1950 to 2020.