Quote (Black XistenZ @ Nov 6 2022 11:32pm)
There were some attacks on select military targets like air defense or radar stations, but alliance soldiers set foot on Iraqi soil less than one day after the proper bombings had begun. Even these bombings focused on military targets. Less than 3 weeks later, Bagdad had fallen.
The war itself had not done a whole lot of direct damage to Iraq's electricity grid. It fell increasingly short of demand in the following years as a combination of multiple factors: missed maintenance, an economic crisis which led to underinvestment, the civil war like conditions during the Iraq insurgency and the country's explosive population growth, from 27m in 2003 to 44m in 2022.
According to [1],
Iraq had about 15.5 hours of electricity per day in February 2010.[1]
https://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Centers/saban/iraq-index/index20110131.PDFIraqs electrical infrastructure was completely destroyed by missile strikes before any american set foot in, anyone who says otherwise is lying.
I visited iraq in 2003-2005 a few times, there was no electricity whatsoever because americans bombed it to shit. They even bombed the mosul-dam generator which used to supply the area i stayed in (a week or so) using bunker busters (according to locals i spoke with who had seen it happen, one of whom was an engineer who used to work on the dam).
The 15.5 hours of electricity isn't what you think it is. There are shortages every 3 hours, where private electric companies using primitive generators supply electricity (only enough for smaller things, not heating/cooling/fridge etc). Even to this day, iraq doesn't have more than 12-13 hours of electricity a day.
As i am an eye-witness, and know people in the area your sources don't mean shit to me. Also insurgency isn't it, because there was no insurgency during 2003-2022 in the areas i visited (just north of mosul dam, also krg infrastructure is only sort of connected to the iraqi grid). Great source though, always interesting to see bullshit to the maximum. Sorta like the one where they said the 91 sanctions didn't lead to any inc child mortality, but when you speak with doctors who worked in the area ( my dad included ) they talk about mass starvation (usually death by protein-deficiency, that is beside all deaths due to no medical supplies, dad used to tell me they would use the same syringe so many times it would break in patients because they couldn't even get suringes. So when you ask him if death rate increased he says probably a million dead kids. If meet anyone from iraq, ask them about the famine during the sanctions they will tell you if people starved or not.)
This post was edited by ownyaah on Nov 6 2022 03:02pm