d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Derek Chauvin Trial Live
Prev1154155156157158168Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
May 14 2021 11:01am
Quote (Skinned @ May 14 2021 10:13am)
Good old boy system needs to go.


The federal system IS a good ol' boy system.

A bunch of unaccountable bureaucrats and federal DA's bribed by George Soros are taking the decision power away from you.

Its funny because the people like you will be the first to be crucified if your desired system actually does happen.
Member
Posts: 129,917
Joined: Oct 3 2006
Gold: 0.69
May 14 2021 11:14am
Quote (Santara @ May 14 2021 12:25pm)
Think of it like this: at one point in the encounter, he was informed by the strenuously objecting bystanders that the suspect was unconscious. At that point, if he had removed his knee from his neck and checked for pulse/breathing, I would say his actions to that point were defensible. This was the inflection point of the encounter. But he didn't. He continued to maintain the pressure, showing a supreme indifference to the condition of the suspect, and loses his claim to acting in good faith with his training. Even the police chief said he exceeded his training.



I understand that inflection point. I know you do to. I don’t think most do however, because it’s extremely simple to state that is to what should have happened, i.e. chauvin should have removed his knee(although should we consider that there was a back angle showing his knee was on his shoulder blade and not neck and also has the autopsy not shown there was not damage to his neck). Also seems as though there are contradictory messages because his neck hold was a an authorized restraining technique.

Quote (Thor123422 @ May 14 2021 12:19pm)
He was rotten, he wasn't removed, and then he murdered a guy. If there was significant interferrence that results in a tainted jury he will be granted a mistrial on appeal and a new trial will happen. However, it's important to realize that this was a very quick and unanimous decision. It's unlikely that he will get a different result.

Floyd being a larger person is irrelevant. The jury that decided the case knew the size of Floyd compared to Chauvin, and saw every fact of the case, and so will any second jury if a mistrial is declared.



It wasn’t murder, more so manslaughter. The public pressure is interference. You can’t be a scientist and be objective and says else wise. It’s a joke.

Also the size of Floyd isn’t to me the relevance of difficulty for the court case, but for all the citizenry getting up in arms about this as if they have any sort of moral superiority they could have apprehended Floyd any better. Some 5’3 female or some soy boy will NEVER truly understand the difficulty of an officer restraining a 6’4 250lb man that police were called on. A good piece of evidence for that is when that female officer did accidentally pull the gun instead of the taser.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 14 2021 11:38am
Quote (Duckling @ May 14 2021 12:14pm)
I understand that inflection point. I know you do to. I don’t think most do however, because it’s extremely simple to state that is to what should have happened, i.e. chauvin should have removed his knee(although should we consider that there was a back angle showing his knee was on his shoulder blade and not neck and also has the autopsy not shown there was not damage to his neck). Also seems as though there are contradictory messages because his neck hold was a an authorized restraining technique.




It wasn’t murder, more so manslaughter. The public pressure is interference. You can’t be a scientist and be objective and says else wise. It’s a joke.

Also the size of Floyd isn’t to me the relevance of difficulty for the court case, but for all the citizenry getting up in arms about this as if they have any sort of moral superiority they could have apprehended Floyd any better. Some 5’3 female or some soy boy will NEVER truly understand the difficulty of an officer restraining a 6’4 250lb man that police were called on. A good piece of evidence for that is when that female officer did accidentally pull the gun instead of the taser.


The jury verdict begs to differ.
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
May 14 2021 11:54am
Quote (Duckling @ May 14 2021 12:14pm)
I understand that inflection point. I know you do to. I don’t think most do however, because it’s extremely simple to state that is to what should have happened, i.e. chauvin should have removed his knee(although should we consider that there was a back angle showing his knee was on his shoulder blade and not neck and also has the autopsy not shown there was not damage to his neck). Also seems as though there are contradictory messages because his neck hold was a an authorized restraining technique.


If you understand that there was an inflection point that occurred, then you yourself admit that his behavior was unacceptable, not just on a moral level, but on a legal one. Why are we having this conversation then?
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 14 2021 12:11pm
Quote (Duckling @ May 14 2021 12:14pm)


It wasn’t murder, more so manslaughter. The public pressure is interference. You can’t be a scientist and be objective and says else wise. It’s a joke.


Jury is already in. Second and third degree murder.

Interference doesn't automatically mean mistrial. It means you need to prove it was a significant enough factor on appeal and might be judged to be a mistrial
Member
Posts: 129,917
Joined: Oct 3 2006
Gold: 0.69
May 14 2021 12:17pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ May 14 2021 01:38pm)
The jury verdict begs to differ.


Quote (Thor123422 @ May 14 2021 02:11pm)
Jury is already in. Second and third degree murder.

Interference doesn't automatically mean mistrial. It means you need to prove it was a significant enough factor on appeal and might be judged to be a mistrial



You two having this clownish thinking... which is exactly what this is ... literally one of the most horrendous things for the country
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 14 2021 12:36pm
Quote (Duckling @ May 14 2021 02:17pm)
You two having this clownish thinking... which is exactly what this is ... literally one of the most horrendous things for the country


You're the one who wants to make murder legal :(
Member
Posts: 129,917
Joined: Oct 3 2006
Gold: 0.69
May 14 2021 01:00pm
Quote (Skinned @ May 14 2021 02:36pm)
You're the one who wants to make murder legal :(



No you’re just a bad faith operative fool that twists words to fit your delusions. Way to slander me you slime bucket piece of filth
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 14 2021 01:24pm
Quote (Duckling @ May 14 2021 01:17pm)
You two having this clownish thinking... which is exactly what this is ... literally one of the most horrendous things for the country


So relying on the justice system is one of the most horrendous things for the country?
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 14 2021 01:29pm
Quote (Duckling @ May 14 2021 03:00pm)
No you’re just a bad faith operative fool that twists words to fit your delusions. Way to slander me you slime bucket piece of filth


You seem triggered.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1154155156157158168Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll