d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Minneapolis Cops
Prev1153154155156157326Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Jun 3 2020 06:16pm
Quote (Santara @ Jun 3 2020 07:04pm)
He's a former criminal defense lawyer. His judgment about what may work is probably better than ours.


A blind trust in a figure of dubious authority trying to strip away fundamental civil liberties?

Santara Fascist
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jun 3 2020 06:17pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 3 2020 08:15pm)
The full autopsy was finally released, just a few minutes ago

https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hennepinus/residents/public-safety/documents/Autopsy_2020-3700_Floyd.pdf



Extremely lengthy and detailed description of the procedure beyond that, but that lays out the findings.
Fentanyl is usually used as an analgesic at ~2 ng/ml and induces anaesthesia at 10-20 ng/ml and is pretty fatal at 25+ ng/ml on its own, but its associated with overdose deaths in poly-substances case at 7+ ng/ml.
the meth was trace amounts hence "indicating prior use", because its generally around 200 ng/ml and lethal at 2500 ng/ml, so it wouldn't be a significant factor

but what they do have is:
1. Strong evidence of underlying heart conditions, covid-19 and poly-substance intoxication with a whole mix of drugs that could all aggravate a heart condition
2. No physical evidence whatsoever consistent with trauma. Not a single finding in the whole autopsy would point to life threatening injuries.


Holy fuck.

There's no way in hell the media is going to tell the truth about this.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 3 2020 06:17pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 3 2020 07:15pm)
The full autopsy was finally released, just a few minutes ago

https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hennepinus/residents/public-safety/documents/Autopsy_2020-3700_Floyd.pdf
Extremely lengthy and detailed description of the procedure beyond that, but that lays out the findings.
Fentanyl is usually used as an analgesic at ~2 ng/ml and induces anaesthesia at 10-20 ng/ml and is pretty fatal at 25+ ng/ml on its own, but its associated with overdose deaths in poly-substances case at 7+ ng/ml.
the meth was trace amounts hence "indicating prior use", because its generally around 200 ng/ml and lethal at 2500 ng/ml, so it wouldn't be a significant factor

but what they do have is:
1. Strong evidence of underlying heart conditions, covid-19 and poly-substance intoxication with a whole mix of drugs that could all aggravate a heart condition
2. No physical evidence whatsoever consistent with trauma. Not a single finding in the whole autopsy would point to life threatening injuries.


Even if he had fentanyl at a depressing level in his system that doesn't necessarily absolve the officer, as he was walking around prior the officer's actions still likely caused the death. Again, this isn't "I just bumped him and he fell over dead", it's "I sat on him for 10 minutes with 3 other officers". It's a point in the officer's favor, but it's not going to get him off on its own.
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
Jun 3 2020 06:24pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 3 2020 08:17pm)
Even if he had fentanyl at a depressing level in his system that doesn't necessarily absolve the officer, as he was walking around prior the officer's actions still likely caused the death. Again, this isn't "I just bumped him and he fell over dead", it's "I sat on him for 10 minutes with 3 other officers". It's a point in the officer's favor, but it's not going to get him off on its own.



If the charges are upgraded (as expected) to 2nd degree murder, there is a good chance he walks.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 3 2020 06:25pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jun 3 2020 07:24pm)
If the charges are upgraded (as expected) to 2nd degree murder, there is a good chance he walks.


I think it depends on the rules. If he can be charged with multiple levels of murder, and they can substantiate one of them, then he won't. I don't know the nuances, but the news stories I see say he's been charged with multiple things from manslaughter up to second degree murder.
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Jun 3 2020 06:28pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 3 2020 07:17pm)
Even if he had fentanyl at a depressing level in his system that doesn't necessarily absolve the officer, as he was walking around prior the officer's actions still likely caused the death. Again, this isn't "I just bumped him and he fell over dead", it's "I sat on him for 10 minutes with 3 other officers". It's a point in the officer's favor, but it's not going to get him off on its own.


Before the officers even restrained him the 911 caller said he was so high he was incoherent, and Floyd repeatedly said "I can't breathe" and exhibited medical distress before being restrained.

There are two competing theories here, one that George Floyd died of homicide inflicted by asphyxiation, one that he experienced heart failure due to natural/drug causes.
And somewhere inbetween there's a degree of culpability based on how much of a factor the restraint actually was in his death and whether it was justified. In the pure homicide narrative, George only died because police choked him and would still be alive and well today otherwise and the entire guilt lies with the officers for unreasonable use of force. In the pure natural causes narrative, George only died because his heart gave out under immense strain and would have happened irrespective of the cop's actions. Trying to reconcile those two competing theories and find the truth between them we have to be guided by the facts and evidence.

And we just got dumped a ton of evidence that establishes George Floyd had basically every extreme comorbidity risk possible of coronavirus, sickle cell anemia, heart disease and multi-substance abuse- and there's no physical signs of trauma at all. And that's on top of evidence indicating possible heart failure prior to being restrained.

And this is a second degree murder case?
the facts are on earth, the legal case is off somewhere in the kuiper belt
Member
Posts: 49,896
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jun 3 2020 06:31pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 4 2020 10:28am)
Before the officers even restrained him the 911 caller said he was so high he was incoherent, and Floyd repeatedly said "I can't breathe" and exhibited medical distress before being restrained.

There are two competing theories here, one that George Floyd died of homicide inflicted by asphyxiation, one that he experienced heart failure due to natural/drug causes.
And somewhere inbetween there's a degree of culpability based on how much of a factor the restraint actually was in his death and whether it was justified. In the pure homicide narrative, George only died because police choked him and would still be alive and well today otherwise and the entire guilt lies with the officers for unreasonable use of force. In the pure natural causes narrative, George only died because his heart gave out under immense strain and would have happened irrespective of the cop's actions. Trying to reconcile those two competing theories and find the truth between them we have to be guided by the facts and evidence.

And we just got dumped a ton of evidence that establishes George Floyd had basically every extreme comorbidity risk possible of coronavirus, sickle cell anemia, heart disease and multi-substance abuse- and there's no physical signs of trauma at all. And that's on top of evidence indicating possible heart failure prior to being restrained.

And this is a second degree murder case?
the facts are on earth, the legal case is off somewhere in the kuiper belt


Lets ignore the fact that had they held him up and called an ambulance he would likely be alive and not even mention that as an option.
I watched the entire video, how many chest compressions were there?
At no stage did they even attempt to help.
When he was completely unresponsive they STILL never attempted to help.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Jun 3 2020 06:33pm
Member
Posts: 50,923
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Jun 3 2020 06:37pm
Quote (Plaguefear @ Jun 3 2020 07:31pm)
Lets ignore the fact that had they held him up and called an ambulance he would likely be alive and not even mention that as an option.
I watched the entire video, how many chest compressions were there?
At no stage did they even attempt to help.
When he was completely unresponsive they STILL never attempted to help.


"Failure to render aid" in Minnesota is a petty misdemeanor, not considered a crime, and punishable by up to a $300 fine and no jail time.
It would be a completely different standard from manslaughter (cause without intent) or murder (cause with intent)
Member
Posts: 49,896
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
Jun 3 2020 06:41pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 4 2020 10:37am)
"Failure to render aid" in Minnesota is a petty misdemeanor, not considered a crime, and punishable by up to a $300 fine and no jail time.
It would be a completely different standard from manslaughter (cause without intent) or murder (cause with intent)


This isn't failing to render aid, this is PREVENTING aid.
They did not aid him, they did not allow him to get aid, this directly caused his death.
If you are drowning in the ocean and i push you away with a big stick every time you nearly reach the shore i have not failed to render aid, i have murdered you.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 3 2020 06:41pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Jun 3 2020 07:37pm)
"Failure to render aid" in Minnesota is a petty misdemeanor, not considered a crime, and punishable by up to a $300 fine and no jail time.
It would be a completely different standard from manslaughter (cause without intent) or murder (cause with intent)


There's also "stopped him from getting aid on his own" and "actively exacerbated the underlying condition". Somebody having a pre-existing condition doesn't mean you can't make the condition worse and have that result in their death.

Might be enough to take it down to some type of manslaughter though. All the news reports are reporting multiple charges from manslaughter to 2nd degree murder, so can they just take the lowest one that sticks?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1153154155156157326Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll