d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Derek Chauvin Trial Live
Prev1146147148149150168Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 5 2021 09:37am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ May 5 2021 09:19am)
Asians surely did a lot of things right, but I think there are additional factors at play. Their average is artificially lifted by the large percentage of highly educated H-1B visa holders among this racial group, who also happen to disproportionately work and live in the highest income regions of the country (Silicon Valley, Seattle and such). Generally speaking, Asians tended to settle disproportionately in regions which have been on the winning side of the economic development of recent decades - the Bay Area, greater LA, Seattle, Atlanta, Houston, the Acela corridor.

By contrast, hispanics are often coming for farm jobs and thus living in stagnant rural areas while poor blacks and whites are often times stuck in the deprived place of their birth due to family ties or their house.


Tldr: for a fair assessment of how well or poorly the ethnic groups have been doing, the metric has to be normalized for geographic patterns and the resulting gap in opportunity.


Yea it is a bit more complicated than asians are beating whites.

Half of whites are math deniers at this point so it wouldn't be a surprise.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 5 2021 09:38am
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 5 2021 09:37am
Quote (EndlessSky @ May 5 2021 09:28am)
Safety nets are the problem, they need to be dismantled. It rings true in basically every area it touches.

I don't see a reason for most of them other than disability and unemployment.

And the age for SS should be 72-80.


you wouldn't know because we've never seen safety nets and a lack of red tape. u can't isolate a factor when its a constant across the board.

the closest we can come is states that are deep red, with large urban areas, with democrat run safety nets implemented on a city level, and red tape removed on a state level. and see how the urban poorer black population is doing there.

on a guess i'd say somewhere in Texas like Austin or Dallas, which even in it's roughest areas and when controlled for cartel violence pails in comparison to areas like Chicago, NYC, LA, etc. but i havent dove into the data.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 5 2021 09:39am
Quote (thesnipa @ May 5 2021 11:37am)
you wouldn't know because we've never seen safety nets and a lack of red tape. u can't isolate a factor when its a constant across the board.

the closest we can come is states that are deep red, with large urban areas, with democrat run safety nets implemented on a city level, and red tape removed on a state level. and see how the urban poorer black population is doing there.

on a guess i'd say somewhere in Texas like Austin or Dallas, which even in it's roughest areas and when controlled for cartel violence pails in comparison to areas like Chicago, NYC, LA, etc. but i havent dove into the data.


If you can remove the cartels you can remove the gangs in Chiraq, NYC, etc. Its the same phenomenon.
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 5 2021 09:40am
Quote (Skinned @ May 5 2021 10:39am)
If you can remove the cartels you can remove the gangs in Chiraq, NYC, etc. Its the same phenomenon.


not at all what im getting at but ok?

im comparing blacks in different regions, and my cartel point was that comparing citywide violent crime rates in NYC vs Dallas is spurious because of cartel violence which is largely non-black.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 5 2021 09:51am
Quote (thesnipa @ May 5 2021 11:40am)
not at all what im getting at but ok?

im comparing blacks in different regions, and my cartel point was that comparing citywide violent crime rates in NYC vs Dallas is spurious because of cartel violence which is largely non-black.


Ok I missed the point then.

Cincinnati is a democratic run city in a red state maybe a good case study.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 5 2021 09:51am
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 5 2021 09:57am
Quote (Skinned @ May 5 2021 10:51am)
Ok I missed the point then.

Cincinnati is a democratic run city in a red state maybe a good case study.


ya im having a hard time finding an example because of the differing ways state by state that both social programs and red tape on enterprise are handled via either state or local authorities. im not sure there is a good example, which while it serves my point that both free enterprise and social programs are needed to uplift urban poor communities it doesnt help in statistically providing evidence.

i dont want to be the "well it doesnt exist so it must work" guy, so i wont go that far, but i still believe it to be true. try being a black guy who wants to open a business in a large urban area, good fucking luck.
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
May 5 2021 10:12am
Quote (thesnipa @ May 5 2021 11:40am)
not at all what im getting at but ok?

im comparing blacks in different regions, and my cartel point was that comparing citywide violent crime rates in NYC vs Dallas is spurious because of cartel violence which is largely non-black.


Its ironic because the cartels in California are basically exterminating the blacks.

No one cares for some reason.
Member
Posts: 92,993
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 5 2021 10:19am
Quote (EndlessSky @ May 5 2021 11:12am)
Its ironic because the cartels in California are basically exterminating the blacks.

No one cares for some reason.


Anti cartel sentiments lead to anti latino sentiments which are protected under the umbrella of intersectional politics on the left.

i had a segment on that very topic in a term paper i wrote on Mexican cartels in undergrad all the way back in 2010 before intersectional politics was a buzzphrase in the lexicon at all.
Member
Posts: 34,649
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 273.37
May 5 2021 10:23am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ May 5 2021 09:19am)
Asians surely did a lot of things right, but I think there are additional factors at play. Their average is artificially lifted by the large percentage of highly educated H-1B visa holders among this racial group, who also happen to disproportionately work and live in the highest income regions of the country (Silicon Valley, Seattle and such). Generally speaking, Asians tended to settle disproportionately in regions which have been on the winning side of the economic development of recent decades - the Bay Area, greater LA, Seattle, Atlanta, Houston, the Acela corridor.

By contrast, hispanics are often coming for farm jobs and thus living in stagnant rural areas while poor blacks and whites are often times stuck in the deprived place of their birth due to family ties or their house.


Tldr: for a fair assessment of how well or poorly the ethnic groups have been doing, the metric has to be normalized for geographic patterns and the resulting gap in opportunity.


It all bleeds together. Highly educated parents are less likely to divorce, freeing up time between them to spend with their children. They have more impressive vocabularies, which their children pick up on. They have more discretionary income, which provides their children with enhanced opportunity.

Asians are more likely tick off the "highly educated" box, and the rest flows from there. There are some very poor Asian communities in the United States (the Hmong come to mind), but I don't think we need to take geography into account, because we aren't making an argument to race. We aren't saying that Asians are simply more intelligent, or more civilized. Cultural factors matter, but they belong to the superstructure. We are making an argument to economic (structural) determinism. Leftists used to be all about this before they fell prey to racialist propaganda.
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
May 5 2021 01:44pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1146147148149150168Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll