Quote (Black XistenZ @ May 5 2021 09:19am)
Asians surely did a lot of things right, but I think there are additional factors at play. Their average is artificially lifted by the large percentage of highly educated H-1B visa holders among this racial group, who also happen to disproportionately work and live in the highest income regions of the country (Silicon Valley, Seattle and such). Generally speaking, Asians tended to settle disproportionately in regions which have been on the winning side of the economic development of recent decades - the Bay Area, greater LA, Seattle, Atlanta, Houston, the Acela corridor.
By contrast, hispanics are often coming for farm jobs and thus living in stagnant rural areas while poor blacks and whites are often times stuck in the deprived place of their birth due to family ties or their house.
Tldr: for a fair assessment of how well or poorly the ethnic groups have been doing, the metric has to be normalized for geographic patterns and the resulting gap in opportunity.
It all bleeds together. Highly educated parents are less likely to divorce, freeing up time between them to spend with their children. They have more impressive vocabularies, which their children pick up on. They have more discretionary income, which provides their children with enhanced opportunity.
Asians are more likely tick off the "highly educated" box, and the rest flows from there. There are some very poor Asian communities in the United States (the Hmong come to mind), but I don't think we need to take geography into account, because we aren't making an argument to race. We aren't saying that Asians are simply more intelligent, or more civilized. Cultural factors matter, but they belong to the superstructure. We are making an argument to economic (structural) determinism. Leftists used to be all about this before they fell prey to racialist propaganda.