Quote (ferdia @ Oct 17 2022 09:36am)
sir, i don't understand what you are implying, can you expand please
The issue isn't demoralization, really. I'm not even sure that hardship demoralizes people. In most cases throughout history, hardship strengthens people's resolve to resist. Being attacked in general always results in people flocking to whoever their leaders are.
You're generalizing things when you say Russia is launching missiles "into the heart of Ukraine." They are launching missiles and drones into power plants, transformer stations, rail facilities, decision making centers for some parts of the Kiev regime, and things closely related to these things.
The front line of a conflict depends on the rear. It needs transport networks and energy to transport people and materiel to the front. It needs resources (human and material) to be spent advancing the war effort, not spent repairing continually accruing damage to infrastructure. It needs factories running to create more weapons and ammunition, clothing and equipment. It needs hospitals operating at sufficient capacity to return experienced but injured troops back to the front. A hundred other smaller things, all of which contribute to a war effort.
Ukraine is in a weird place here because the bulk of it's war fighting capacity is being provided externally, which excuses it from a lot of the normal rules. But not transport, not the basic functioning of a modern society.
Quote (ferdia @ Oct 17 2022 09:36am)
seperately, the current narrative is focused on russia. nobody really cares what some superpower does elsewhere in the world, whether it be torture or terrorism or war (soft or hard).
The "current narrative" in the West is always about some enemy or another. I'm old enough to remember quite well the coverage of the Iraq War, and even in March of 2003 the discussion was not about "American terrorism" anywhere but Democracy Now and Counterpunch.