I'd love to read Satana's sources of journalistic integrity. So far all he's been saying was already said countless of times on mainstream medias.


This post was edited by Melatonina on Oct 13 2022 06:42am

leading questions are for mental peons indeed.

i tell you smth: if media would show you TODAY a picture of a nuclear bomb, stationed in a desert, written on it „saddams property“ , you would believe it was real...

you need pictures and sources for ressources in each country? if you havent looked it up yet, you are not really interested in politics, youre just a common „blabla“ random who needs to protect a system he profits in, even the world arround him drowns.

two options:
1: youre a lier
2: you are a retard who give a shit on humans society

same counts for

i have never ever read anything that goes into a SOLUTION of the problem..

if you guys dont speak out the problem you cant discuss, and as long as you speak out what the medias and finance elites problems are i cannot be friendly with you.

or you just lie and hate.

This post was edited by Bananii on Oct 13 2022 07:27am

shut up fascist offspring, go join Hitler

heil marx motherfucker! 🖕🏻

Your making assumptions here and your options are inadequate and incoherent to me. The british government already admitted they went into Iraq on false pretenses, and as we already said previously it is already agreed that by the time of the invasion Saddam had no WMD's. If YOU want to believe Saddam had WMD's you would not be alone in this thinking, but again we provided ample evidence (in this topic with sources quoted) from the key parties involved which clearly highlighted there were no WMD's.

Also, while pictures can lie, or people can make up their own stories about them ( as we saw yesterday with the playground "Putin targeting school playgrounds"), if you read about situations from various sources you can form your own opinion. I dont have to agree with everything that Lvivz posts, but that does not make everything he posts wrong. everyone, me included, will have immature views on subjects and its only through healthy debate that you can inform yourself and consider your position, which is what some of us are doing. If you dont believe anything from any source, and think it pointless to even explore an issue, well *shrugs* what are you even doing here then.

with brevity: the point of asking posters to provide images, and sources, is for us the audience to consider the content, whether we have read it before or not, from the same source, or not.

This post was edited by ferdia on Oct 13 2022 07:40am

AWAY YOU DEMON

also while my arguement with Lvivz regarding his Orc comments got me suspended yesterday ( ) he did post this, and i regard it as one of his best contributions to the topic. no one commented on it, so I feel it worth while to repost:



a fine contribution with source and exactly the kind of thing that is helpful in the topic (you dont have to agree with the content, its just helpful to get a better understanding of issues you may not be aware of).

This post was edited by ferdia on Oct 13 2022 07:46am

google: ressources oil gas wordwide

5sec google, few mins checking several sources and start using your brain

you need pictures? go on watch TV...

i repeat: if you have never ever checked out where ressources are in world, you have never ever really been interested in politics.

same counts for 80% of people on jsp here

In the round, noting the last time I argued with someone in this topic (they were being racist) I was sanctioned, I will let someone else converse with you (unless they too, dont want to).