d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russiagate Gathering Steam?
Prev1138139140141142445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
May 25 2018 01:44pm
Quote (Goomshill @ May 25 2018 10:17am)
Because its extremely obviously a media sculpting a deflecting narrative. Like you say, its up to politicians to craft the language and optics, thats politics 101. What gets bonkers is when the media are the ones crafting the opposition narrative and attempting desperately to reframe the controversy- not the opposition party. They're using an unnamed source in some totally unknown context, which for all we know could be totally made up or just playing purple-monkey-dishwasher. And to what end? To craft a counter-narrative of the connotation of the action, not what the action actually is.

As we established early on, its plainly spying. Obviously by the loose definitions of spying as surveillance in general, but even by the stricter definitions of state agencies using hired operatives to conduct surveillance without the knowledge of their target and report it back to their handler. And if one politician wants to call it 'spying' and the other 'investigating', well that's like 'freedom fighters' vs 'terrorists'. But when the media, even supposedly credible outlets, go out and try to desperately deny that 'spying' is applicable and then seek out whatever tortured headline they can assemble from the unsourced words of an anonymous official- that's the problem.

Imagine if the media had taken this same level of scrutiny with the DNC and Hillary in the wake of the DNC emails being published. Was the media tripping over itself to seek out anonymous sources to claim that Hillary was seeking to rebrand the leaked emails as russia interference to distract from the fallout of the controversy? Maybe some blips on fox news or breitbart, bless their hearts for being just as crooked but in the other direction. No, instead we got shit like this; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izpT4Ye6wdE

Come now, this is what offends me more than anything else in politics, the assault on logic, rational thought and the truth. Instead of being a debate over the actual merits of whether Halper was justifiably spying on the campaign and if the FBI had good reason to put him there- which they arguably might, considering he targeted only carter page before the investigation started and page was already a target, nevermind the bad decision of using Halper of all people- instead of that debate, we're- hang on now I"m almost through this run-on sentence- instead we're dealing with what the definition of the word 'is' is.




Yep, it is insanely stupid for Dem-allied media to frame it this way. They should stick to the narrative that the alphabet agencies only embed spies into criminal operations, and the very fact that the federal agencies felt a need to embed a spy is evidence of criminal activity within the criminal Trump enterprise of criminals.

Being a traitor is an executable crime. Trump and his base are traitors. We should be calling for right wing heads to roll, not this weak fucking semantics debate.
Member
Posts: 93,001
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 25 2018 02:04pm
Quote (Goomshill @ May 25 2018 01:35pm)
just because you can't put the genie back in the bottle doesn't mean he's going to curse the kingdom with 40 days and nights of rains of sand and salt and turn people into stone until someone collects the nine tears of esmesanti.
lets remember that up until very recently, our futurologists had this vision of a future of interconnectedness from social media and the information superhighway that would erode tribalism and rectify prejudices and bring people together. They thought that if information can be shared instantly on a global scale, the truth will out. Well clearly, those cunts never played a game of dota with spaniards or pinoys, because I never had a bone in my body against them until I had to put up with their shit. And as has been noted by all those crow-eating talking heads, the internet has instead formed echo chambers and clouds of disinformation and propaganda.
But was their vision really wrong? Just because we haven't reached it yet, doesn't mean its not going to happen. Whether we're passing through a phase or rolling downhill into oblivion- if I could make that call with certainty, I'd be a stock analyst. But I put my money on the optimist interpretation.


perhaps our difference of opinion is that simple, i'm very pessimistic on the subject. i don't think that a universal truth will emerge unless one side wins in an orwellian takeover that is ruthlessly enforced. as i dont see that as a realistic chance by any means i dont see it as a possible outcome.

countercultures will continue to cause ebb and flow in which political viewpoint is in control on a local, regional, and national level. the likelihood that we get 3+ parties instead of one is hundredfold greater, being conservative. and even that isn't likely. but if we ever get to 3+ parties "truth" will be even more deluded.

i still don't think that truth has been truly diluted, they just aren't bothering to publicly correct themselves. articles have historically always been untruthful, this the last page of the paper being rife with corrections. we can't blame them for not correcting themselves on a micro level when our attention spans have gotten too short for that mirco level of detail to be retained.

i also understand that you hold logic, rational thought, and truthfulness on high. but keep in mind most of your right winged brethren keep that armor on as a guise for their own biased demand for news they agree with. you're beating the drums of war in a line of soldiers just waiting to drop their lances and turn tail as soon as the cavalry charges. not a criticism of your action, but a sad reality. fake news is a term coined by those who love just as fake of news, its a hypocritical political action movement from the start. and i dont believe in intersectional politics with liars which ultimately wont change much if anything. i have better uses of my time, like arguing on jsp.

Quote (inkanddagger @ May 25 2018 01:44pm)
Yep, it is insanely stupid for Dem-allied media to frame it this way. They should stick to the narrative that the alphabet agencies only embed spies into criminal operations, and the very fact that the federal agencies felt a need to embed a spy is evidence of criminal activity within the criminal Trump enterprise of criminals.

Being a traitor is an executable crime. Trump and his base are traitors. We should be calling for right wing heads to roll, not this weak fucking semantics debate.


kek.

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 25 2018 02:05pm
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 25 2018 02:09pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ 25 May 2018 15:44)
Yep, it is insanely stupid for Dem-allied media to frame it this way. They should stick to the narrative that the alphabet agencies only embed spies into criminal operations, and the very fact that the federal agencies felt a need to embed a spy is evidence of criminal activity within the criminal Trump enterprise of criminals.

Being a traitor is an executable crime. Trump and his base are traitors. We should be calling for right wing heads to roll, not this weak fucking semantics debate.

so says the subversive bloodlusting election-denier :rofl:
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
May 25 2018 02:34pm
Quote (excellence @ May 25 2018 01:09pm)
so says the subversive bloodlusting election-denier :rofl:


When have I ever denied the election? Never.

But I do have a certain kind of bloodlust. I want to see rivers of red pouring in the streets in the red states. We need a civil war to purge conservatives form this earth, and we will fertilize our mother nature with their bloated rotting corpses.
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
May 25 2018 02:55pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ May 25 2018 12:34pm)
When have I ever denied the election? Never.

But I do have a certain kind of bloodlust. I want to see rivers of red pouring in the streets in the red states. We need a civil war to purge conservatives form this earth, and we will fertilize our mother nature with their bloated rotting corpses.


You sure do have a thing for conservative white Christians...
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 25 2018 02:55pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ 25 May 2018 16:34)
When have I ever denied the election? Never.

But I do have a certain kind of bloodlust. I want to see rivers of red pouring in the streets in the red states. We need a civil war to purge conservatives form this earth, and we will fertilize our mother nature with their bloated rotting corpses.

you’re a resister. reality of the 2016 election is something that cannot be dealt with, and thus placed in a frame of mind that must be not accepted.

and you can always return to your homeland where you spawned with privilege most of the world could only dream of, and start it yourself

or go keep on wasting your 30s posting slightly edgy stuff in the off-topic section on a d2 forum

This post was edited by excellence on May 25 2018 03:08pm
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
May 25 2018 03:07pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ May 25 2018 03:34pm)
When have I ever denied the election? Never.

But I do have a certain kind of bloodlust. I want to see rivers of red pouring in the streets in the red states. We need a civil war to purge conservatives form this earth, and we will fertilize our mother nature with their bloated rotting corpses.


Member
Posts: 16,993
Joined: Sep 18 2010
Gold: 28,044.60
May 25 2018 03:11pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ May 25 2018 09:34pm)
When have I ever denied the election? Never.

But I do have a certain kind of bloodlust. I want to see rivers of red pouring in the streets in the red states. We need a civil war to purge conservatives form this earth, and we will fertilize our mother nature with their bloated rotting corpses.


Intolerant bigot.

Fortunately, your reprehensible ravings are just fantasies of a sick, weak boy. In reality, if you ever actually tried to put what you were saying in action, the liberals would be crushed within a matter of weeks.

Stronger men, particularly those who take good care of their bodies, are more likely to be conservative. This can easily be explained as achieving a robust and aesthetic physique requires consistent hard work and dedication, something most liberals know nothing about.

Furthermore, conservatives generally support the 2nd amendment and many have personal firearms.

How long do you think a bunch of unarmed sissy boys who are either overweight or famished will last against strong conservative men with guns?

This post was edited by EA7 on May 25 2018 03:12pm
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
May 25 2018 03:19pm
Quote (excellence @ May 25 2018 01:55pm)
you’re a resister. reality of the 2016 election is something that cannot be dealt with, and thus placed in a frame of mind that must be not accepted.

and you can always return to your homeland where you spawned with privilege most of the world could only dream of, and start it yourself

or go keep on wasting your 30s posting slightly edgy stuff in the off-topic section on a d2 forum




No, I've pretty much always wanted you people to die. At least since around 1995. From diabetes and heart disease.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on May 25 2018 03:20pm
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
May 25 2018 03:27pm
Quote (excellence @ May 25 2018 01:55pm)
you’re a resister. reality of the 2016 election is something that cannot be dealt with, and thus placed in a frame of mind that must be not accepted.

and you can always return to your homeland where you spawned with privilege most of the world could only dream of, and start it yourself

or go keep on wasting your 30s posting slightly edgy stuff in the off-topic section on a d2 forum


I'm bored and you people are boring.

I'm not a resister by the way. I'm happy Trump was elected over Clinton. It's good for rational, normal people to be able to see how fractured the average conservative brain is occasionally so we can keep shifting society incrementally to the left. And it will be the United States military that you people will have to deal with, not me. I'm a pacifist. But I don't mind entertaining thoughts of right wing fucks being slaughtered by the military they claim to love.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1138139140141142445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll