Quote (Djunior @ 2 Oct 2022 10:12)
Of course.
I've stated a long time ago that Ukraine would've fallen already if it wasn't backed by the West. The amount of aid have they received so far is likely more than their entire military is worth.
So, do you agree that Russia does not actually have "way more military resources" at its disposal than Ukraine (even if most of Ukraine's arms come from NATO)?
Quote (Goomshill @ 2 Oct 2022 09:27)
There is, however a reasonable argument that Putinism is a rational self interest aimed at gaining geopolitical advantage, whereas American foreign policy has been wantonly self destructive and irrational, acting against our own interests. The way this saga started with Euromaidan->Crimea->Syria shows that Russian leveraged chaos for advantage in a zero sum game at every turn while America tripped over its own dick. I think the real enemy of Putin would be leadership competent enough to outplay him at his own game. The current strategy of blind jingoism that claims we're winning, as we're losing- is working no better than the last half dozen times we tried it
How exactly are the United States losing right now? An argument can
perhaps be made that Europe is on the losing side and would have been better off throwing Ukraine to the wolves in favor of uninterrupted energy and trade flows with Russia, even after we factor in the geopolitical implications - but the US? What they get out of this war, geopolitically, is worth far more than what they've spent in Ukraine so far.
Also, from the point of view of ordinary Russians, Putinism is definitely not serving their rational self-interest; does definitely not represent "winning". Russia has ludicrous amounts of natural resources and fertile land, relative to its comparatively small population. Russia should and could be a 30 times larger version of Norway if it was competently run, instead of being bled dry by Putin's corrupt cleptocracy.
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Oct 2 2022 02:46am