Industrial military complex and banking industry did. No war is good for the people it's only good for profiteering buying up land businesses pennies on a dollar.
Putin would be making bank on the crisis just like Rothschild's did from WW2.

Eventually the resources would dwindle, the West won't put up with freezing cold winters, the lack of energy and sky-rocketing cost of living. By then Putin will Pull out, but that exit strategy has been calculated long before the war began

This post was edited by addone on Oct 1 2022 03:19pm

Clearly they haven't achieved what they wanted to achieve, which is why they are now mobilizing.

In WW2 they literally lost millions and millions but never gave up.

What did the West win by escalating this shit show? Can anyone present the costs at this point? ALL the costs, aid, weapons deliveries, energy costs, etc.

And then think this is only the beginning



So did the Ukrainians and Russia has way more resources
.

lol, even Russia-haters like Santara admit that Ukraine is taking 2-3 times as many losses as the Russians. Real number is probably close to the 10-1 the Russians claim when you see Ukrainians conscripting students.

This post was edited by kusotarre1 on Oct 1 2022 03:21pm

the discussion wasn't about ukrainian losses thou lmao.

nice what about-ism.

while you are at it, just say 1000 ukrainians for one russian :)))

Putin escalated. Everyday Russia is still fighting in Ukraine, Nato are "winning"

Russia have removed themselves as a conventional threat to Nato.

hmmm thats weird.

In the midst of this war and hostility between Russia and the West .
Russia is allowing the US to inspect their Sarmat ICBM?

anyone can confirm this ?

https://eurasiantimes.com/war-russia-to-allow-us-to-inspect-rs-28-sarmat/

Russia and previously the USSR has been committed to nuclear arms reduction policies for decades. It's America that constantly breaks and walks out of the treaties.

It's a gesture of goodwill from Russia that costs nothing.

Do they? On its own, Ukraine would have fallen a long time ago. They can only hang in there because of Western arms supplies. So speaking purely in terms of guns, tanks, missiles, ammo and that stuff, the question is if Russia has more resources than what NATO is willing to send to Ukraine. NATO has multiple times the military resources of Russia, but they're obviously only willing to send a fraction of it to Ukraine. Hence, the question of which side has more military resources at its disposal in the long run is actually not trivial at all.

Ukrainian armed forces recaptured the strategic town of Lyman (Ukraine) from the Russians, constituting a major victory in this conflict which began last February.
This town is part of the pseudo-annexed and declared "Russian" territory by Putin yesterday...

This thread remind me how many people are willing to drink the koolaid and go with what they are told by the matrix.