d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Taking Their Guns
Prev1121314151619Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,960
Joined: Nov 29 2008
Gold: 40.64
Oct 18 2019 10:50am
I think these articles could help clarify things a little

Washington State Red Flag Law:
https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=7.94

General article about Red Flag Laws in the US:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_flag_law

Article covering what Due Process means:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/due_process


Sorry to just drop links without adding to the discussion but this discussion needs these links!
Member
Posts: 15,467
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 475.46
Oct 18 2019 11:06am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Oct 18 2019 10:43am)
Why would anyone have reason to believe the government isn't perfect and moral?


I dunno. Society seems to be functioning and we dont have interment camps.

Lay off the Infowars.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Oct 18 2019 11:07am
I bet these guys have a mental issue if they cant understand that guns today now is not the same deal than 250 years ago: Like 10 times cheaper and 20 times more dangerous (or something like that)
Regarding the well organized militias : Atomwaffen.meme.png
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2019 11:16am
Quote (Santara @ Oct 18 2019 11:43am)
There's a higher legal bar to clear for arresting someone than there is for simply stopping them.

/e that is to say, a cop can stop someone, but he can't simply stop and detain people for no reason. Effecting an arrest however, he HAS reason.


The question is who they have to articulate that reason to. Im not aware of any court case or law that says they have to articulate that reason to you at the time of stop, arrest, etc
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 18 2019 11:17am
Quote (Brian_D @ Oct 18 2019 12:06pm)
I dunno. Society seems to be functioning and we dont have interment camps.

Lay off the Infowars.


This calls for a perfunctory "fuck off."
Member
Posts: 93,003
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Oct 18 2019 11:18am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 18 2019 11:41am)
hypothetical

Cop gives an answer like "you were driving erratic" guy continues to challenge and ask for a 'real' reason. At what point does the guy need to provide ID? Or is it the guy can argue and challenge ad nauseam?

People need to learn to pick their battles. Like why escalate for no reason? What point are you proving? Give the cop the ID and make him feel stupid while he's fumbling afterwards as he can't give you a ticket for anything or make him feel stupid in court. I got two tickets in one stop awhile ago and i went to court for them and the judge berated the cop in front of a crowd and made him feel like an amateur.


driving erratically is a real reason. reckless driving is a ticket-able offense.

the only situation this comes up in that's actually a problem would be a cop pulling someone over for nothing.
Member
Posts: 13,364
Joined: Feb 1 2010
Gold: 0.77
Oct 18 2019 11:20am
Quote (cambovenzi @ 18 Oct 2019 10:43)
Why would anyone have reason to believe the government isn't perfect and moral?


Tuskegee syphilis experiment


Quote (Brian_D @ 18 Oct 2019 11:06)
I dunno. Society seems to be functioning and we dont have interment camps.

Lay off the Infowars.



Inb4 gitmo fills up with "neo nazis"

This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Oct 18 2019 11:28am
Member
Posts: 28,886
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 18 2019 11:25am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 18 2019 01:18pm)
driving erratically is a real reason. reckless driving is a ticket-able offense.

the only situation this comes up in that's actually a problem would be a cop pulling someone over for nothing.


Quite subjective and the point of me saying that is a cop could give some vague ass reason and technically be justified. So is verbalizing a bullshit reason enough? Like if he says you're driving erratically and you say no i wasn't, are you going to continue to challenge him and refuse to show ID?
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 18 2019 11:28am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2019 12:16pm)
The question is who they have to articulate that reason to. Im not aware of any court case or law that says they have to articulate that reason to you at the time of stop, arrest, etc


If you're stopped and they have no cause to arrest you, then it stands to reason you won't get a day in court in the first place, therefore you can refuse to identify on the grounds that the officer can't articulate a probable cause for a stop. No probable cause, just stand your ground, call in his superiors, etc.
Member
Posts: 93,003
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Oct 18 2019 11:31am
Quote (ofthevoid @ Oct 18 2019 12:25pm)
Quite subjective and the point of me saying that is a cop could give some vague ass reason and technically be justified. So is verbalizing a bullshit reason enough? Like if he says you're driving erratically and you say no i wasn't, are you going to continue to challenge him and refuse to show ID?


there's two conversations to be had here. what's legally valid, and what someone should do.

the judgement of what a cop does or citizen does being reasonable or unreasonable legally happen in a court of law. and with all cop/citizen interactions things can happen before court that are dire.

i personally would ask what i did if i was blankly asked for an ID. if i felt pushback and got no answer i'd still provide id, then immediately ask what i did after providing it. but i also have a dash cam, not just for cops (havent been pulled over in 15 years) but also for crashes (also havent had one in 15 years of driving) so i can't be held accountable for something i didnt do.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1121314151619Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll