Oh, maybe you'd be happier about the one where the UN group doing the checking to see if Iran is honoring the deal, take 1/2 it's reports, not from 1st hand, but by taking Iran's word for it?
I can understand you don't like me or my views...but this Iran deal is a joke, and it needs to be dealt with.

Maybe you don't mind radioactive corn flakes, but I like to limit mine to just milk and a bit of sugar. :/

Iran deal was fine. Renegging is necer good. We put a known welcher in the WH. Iran would bw smart to just ignore things until 2020.

This post was edited by Skinned on Nov 16 2017 03:49pm

maybe just don't use words that you later have to renig on, like this deal.

Pipe dreams.



A time limit on a deal to prevent the development of nukes IS a loophole.
Maybe you should think before you type.


/e Me giving you a 3rd loophole cause the other two were obviously too hard to understand, does not count as a renege.

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 16 2017 03:56pm

no, it's not. that's a limit on the deal, a basic function of most deals. by that logic all patents have "loopholes".

Just wait 100 years to print that book once it passes into the public domain, LOOPHOLE!

Yeah, yeah, like the Geneva Convention, huh?

This isn't books we're talking about...this is nukes, but keep trolling. LOL

loop·hole
ˈlo͞opˌ(h)ōl/Submit
noun
1.
an ambiguity or inadequacy in the law or a set of rules.


There's nothing ambiguous or inadequate about the deal lasting ten years, or being restricted to nuclear development. The definition of loophole you are using would literally include every feature of every deal ever made.

LMFAO, I guess you now need to look up ambiguity or inadequacy. Either that or you will just have to keep on trolling.
You make me laugh....at you.

Sigh, just the most recent in a long line of you showcasing your ignorance.

Keep thinking the ability to post here is a bug and not a feature

I think Imma let you troll with yourself for a while. Your hand up to the task?