I'm only in favor of his ideas, not the man himself. I wish we ended up with the same ideas but coming from a man who could present himself well.

Do you two three have some kind of disability, that prevents you from staying on topic?

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 16 2017 03:06pm

More of a miscibility, really.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Nov 16 2017 03:06pm

Clever, but even though Iran probably IS part and parcel of this whole "small countries with nukes" crap that has recently blossomed, I don't think the "reasons" are the same.
NK is a pawn for China, in it's attempt to get the US out of the South China Sea area, so China can assimilate all of the area.
Whereas the Iran situation is just more terrorist crap to come.

Why do you think the U.S. has a right to nukes but not anyone else?

Why do you think the civilian death count from U.S. bombs in places we should never have gone doesn't equate to terrorism in the eyes of the native population?

Why and how are we better or more worthy?

Can toy give me one loophole from the deal?

No, I think you should go back and read what loopholes the deal has, that I've already posted.

ICBM and it having a time limit aren't loopholes

Yeah, maybe you're right. Why should anyone care if the deal keeping Iran from developing nukes was only ten years long.
I'm sure those fanatical religious zealots will become a model country in the eight years that remain.

We already know this will happen cause we can tell that they're not developing ICMBs as well. :/

wow i think you found a loophole in the concept of what a loophole is.