Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 23 2022 04:39pm)
NATO's reason for existing is to destroy Russia. That's always been it's major goal. That's why it was created, why it was staffed with a bunch of former Third Reich officers, why it continued to expand towards Russia.
To you, the destruction of Libya is academic, just some thing on the other side of the world that you get to pass meaningless judgment on. To Russia, the destruction of Libya was a warning that NATO was still an aggressive danger, not just a scheme for selling overpriced American weapons platforms.
NATO's raison d'etre is to provide collective defense from Soviet aggression, for which there was ample contemporary evidence.
Quote (chopstickz777 @ Sep 23 2022 04:36pm)
No. I just have strong pro-Russian viewpoints, for the time being. And I want to see Donbass thriving and free of shelling. This is a big step in the right direction.
The Ukrops have responded to the referendum with more shelling aimed at civilians. Why am I not surprised.
Strong *Kremlin* viewpoints. I bet they're put out daily in a bulletin to all the trolls.