d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1126712681269127012715001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Sep 23 2022 03:27pm
Quote (Palasan @ Sep 23 2022 11:18pm)
Oww yes 30 Germans 10 Poles and half of Dane
Such support!
NOBODY IN WHOLE NATO except for like Poland even can meet their required GDP% spending for military, we basically give them money to maintain their militaries forever now


are you really that dumb?

germany alone supplied 90k soldiers in the 20 years in afghanistan alone

2 minutes of research mate

Member
Posts: 50,915
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Sep 23 2022 03:29pm
Quote (Palasan @ Sep 23 2022 04:11pm)
imagine USA telling Hungary to mobilize for war in Syria or Iraq


https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/hungary-to-send-troops-to-kurdish-iraq-115041400906_1.html
Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 7 2022
Gold: 3.00
Sep 23 2022 03:31pm
Member
Posts: 50,915
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Sep 23 2022 03:35pm
Quote (Palasan @ Sep 23 2022 04:31pm)
Did we order them to do that?


What happens when Hungary refuses to obey orders from its foreign masters?
Member
Posts: 3,771
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 14,158.00
Sep 23 2022 03:36pm
Quote (Santara @ Sep 23 2022 01:20pm)


I love when you let passive phraseology slip and include yourself with your Russian brothers. "Let's" = let US. Good job blowing your cover again huylo.


No. I just have strong pro-Russian viewpoints, for the time being. And I want to see Donbass thriving and free of shelling. This is a big step in the right direction.

The Ukrops have responded to the referendum with more shelling aimed at civilians. Why am I not surprised.

Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 23 2022 03:39pm
Quote (Santara @ Sep 23 2022 01:40pm)
Attacking Libya was bad. Attacking Ukraine is also bad. 2+2=4

NATO's reason for existing is to destroy Russia. That's always been it's major goal. That's why it was created, why it was staffed with a bunch of former Third Reich officers, why it continued to expand towards Russia.

To you, the destruction of Libya is academic, just some thing on the other side of the world that you get to pass meaningless judgment on. To Russia, the destruction of Libya was a warning that NATO was still an aggressive danger, not just a scheme for selling overpriced American weapons platforms.
Member
Posts: 54,184
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Sep 23 2022 03:46pm
Quote (Palasan @ 23 Sep 2022 23:11)
ITS NOTHING LIKE THAT AT ALL LOL
Roman Empire could mobilize its vassal states at will, imagine USA telling Hungary to mobilize for war in Syria or Iraq


Quote (JohnnyMcCoy @ 23 Sep 2022 23:14)
you do realise they got plenty of support in both afghanistan, iraq and to some degree in syria?


We don't have to debate in hypotheticals here, the second Iraq war is a real world example of major NATO states refusing allegiance to a US-led war. France, Germany, Canada, Norway, Belgium and Greece all stayed out of the conflict, as did the non-NATO allies Israel, Ireland, Austria and New Zealand. Major NATO members Turkey and Spain withdrew their troops very soon, before Iraq had even descended into chaos.
Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 7 2022
Gold: 3.00
Sep 23 2022 03:47pm
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 24 2022 12:39am)
NATO's reason for existing is to destroy Russia. That's always been it's major goal. That's why it was created, why it was staffed with a bunch of former Third Reich officers, why it continued to expand towards Russia.

To you, the destruction of Libya is academic, just some thing on the other side of the world that you get to pass meaningless judgment on. To Russia, the destruction of Libya was a warning that NATO was still an aggressive danger, not just a scheme for selling overpriced American weapons platforms.


That would be all and well except that RUSSIA didn't exist when NATO was created
Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 7 2022
Gold: 3.00
Sep 23 2022 03:55pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 24 2022 12:35am)
What happens when Hungary refuses to obey orders from its foreign masters?


Yes because we are foreign masters of Hungary, I am quite sure Hungary does whatever the fuck Hungary wants to do. Even in your link they had a vote on whether they should send those soldiers.
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Sep 23 2022 03:55pm
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 23 2022 04:39pm)
NATO's reason for existing is to destroy Russia. That's always been it's major goal. That's why it was created, why it was staffed with a bunch of former Third Reich officers, why it continued to expand towards Russia.

To you, the destruction of Libya is academic, just some thing on the other side of the world that you get to pass meaningless judgment on. To Russia, the destruction of Libya was a warning that NATO was still an aggressive danger, not just a scheme for selling overpriced American weapons platforms.


NATO's raison d'etre is to provide collective defense from Soviet aggression, for which there was ample contemporary evidence.

Quote (chopstickz777 @ Sep 23 2022 04:36pm)
No. I just have strong pro-Russian viewpoints, for the time being. And I want to see Donbass thriving and free of shelling. This is a big step in the right direction.

The Ukrops have responded to the referendum with more shelling aimed at civilians. Why am I not surprised.


Strong *Kremlin* viewpoints. I bet they're put out daily in a bulletin to all the trolls.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1126712681269127012715001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll