d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Covid 19 Vaccine
Prev1126612671268126912701273Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 24 2025 12:40pm
what makes u say that?

u know that ur news is lying to u right?
u poor american dont benefit from a public news broadcast system like we do here with the BBC.
PBS and so on has been financially strangled by your incompetent government so u r relying on private channels or moreover youtubers, influencers and content creators.

but careful! that is not journalism - this is business.
its not what is based on facts - its what sells.

so stop falling for their lies.
the conspiracy is real! u know it!
u r simply in the wrong lane my concerned friend!


You know nothing lol

People still die because of the ongoing COVID vaccine program

COVID vaccine hearings as we speak, you should just check what this doc has to say ~ 28:10 - 34:20

6 minutes you can do it champ

Member
Posts: 9,645
Joined: Mar 28 2022
Gold: 34,515.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 25 2025 12:08am
Hey junior. Might wanna check your sources.

This (the ET) is again a private business. That is an evaluation of its credibility.

Different media-rating organizations give conflicting assessments of its reliability. Media Bias/Fact Check describes “The Economic Times” as right‑center in bias and “questionable” in credibility due to numerous failed fact checks. By contrast, another rater (Biasly) scores “Economic Times” close to center in bias and “average” in reliability, while GadgetReview’s trust-scoring system labels it “Not Trusted” overall.

Given these mixed evaluations, it is safer to treat Economic Times articles as a starting point rather than a sole authority, especially on politically sensitive or highly technical claims. For important decisions or contentious topics, cross‑verify key facts with additional reputable sources (for example, official data, international outlets, or research reports) before relying on them.

U r welcome! :hug:
Member
Posts: 1,251
Joined: Oct 15 2023
Gold: 0.00
Nov 25 2025 02:04am
Never. I refused back then, and will continue to refuse. I believe anyone none elder, or people with bad immunedefense, should get vaccinated organicly.
Member
Posts: 9,645
Joined: Mar 28 2022
Gold: 34,515.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 25 2025 02:27am
should get vaccinated organicly.


Shows that you don't understand the basisc about our immune system.
Sad - because anything I say won't be able to change your mind.
I hope u stay safe then! :angel:

Member
Posts: 1,251
Joined: Oct 15 2023
Gold: 0.00
Nov 25 2025 02:46am
Shows that you don't understand the basisc about our immune system.
Sad - because anything I say won't be able to change your mind.
I hope u stay safe then! :angel:


And im fine with that. Merry christmas to you and a happy new year :santa:
Member
Posts: 27,245
Joined: Nov 18 2006
Gold: 2,016.68
Nov 25 2025 02:51pm
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 26 2025 12:12pm
Hey junior. Might wanna check your sources.

This (the ET) is again a private business. That is an evaluation of its credibility.

Different media-rating organizations give conflicting assessments of its reliability. Media Bias/Fact Check describes “The Economic Times” as right‑center in bias and “questionable” in credibility due to numerous failed fact checks. By contrast, another rater (Biasly) scores “Economic Times” close to center in bias and “average” in reliability, while GadgetReview’s trust-scoring system labels it “Not Trusted” overall.

Given these mixed evaluations, it is safer to treat Economic Times articles as a starting point rather than a sole authority, especially on politically sensitive or highly technical claims. For important decisions or contentious topics, cross‑verify key facts with additional reputable sources (for example, official data, international outlets, or research reports) before relying on them.

U r welcome! :hug:


WTF is this reply even. They show the hearings in full they're not stitching stuff together like the BBC likes to do, lol

You're the denier here SMH

People like you are completely lost
Member
Posts: 46,794
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 100.00
Nov 26 2025 12:17pm
WTF is this reply even. They show the hearings in full they're not stitching stuff together like the BBC likes to do, lol

You're the denier here SMH

People like you are completely lost


hes a gibber troll
Member
Posts: 9,645
Joined: Mar 28 2022
Gold: 34,515.00
Warn: 10%
Nov 27 2025 01:11am
WTF is this reply even. They show the hearings in full they're not stitching stuff together like the BBC likes to do, lol

You're the denier here SMH

People like you are completely lost


they feature some1 who has repeatedly been proven to be a charlatan.

"McCullough also claims that the “largest autopsy study ever assembled of death after Covid-19 vaccination worldwide”, which he was an author of, found that 73.9% of the deaths after vaccination are due to the vaccine.
AFP fact-checked the study in July, interviewing experts who pointed to flawed methodology and doubts about the authors’ credentials. The preprint appeared first on a preprint server associated with The Lancet, but was then removed as its methodology did not support its conclusions."


Standard procedure for a news corp like ET - they create clicks with outragous claims.

"Family desaster has struck the royal family!"
a pet bird has died

Just because it fits your narrative doesnt make it true - even though u want it to be so very badly.

But brighten up m8!
I'm not beating u up about it - we can still b friends :hug:

This post was edited by Sankturio on Nov 27 2025 01:13am
Member
Posts: 15,918
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Nov 27 2025 08:32am
they feature some1 who has repeatedly been proven to be a charlatan.

"McCullough also claims that the “largest autopsy study ever assembled of death after Covid-19 vaccination worldwide”, which he was an author of, found that 73.9% of the deaths after vaccination are due to the vaccine.
AFP fact-checked the study in July, interviewing experts who pointed to flawed methodology and doubts about the authors’ credentials. The preprint appeared first on a preprint server associated with The Lancet, but was then removed as its methodology did not support its conclusions."


Standard procedure for a news corp like ET - they create clicks with outragous claims.

"Family desaster has struck the royal family!"
a pet bird has died

Just because it fits your narrative doesnt make it true - even though u want it to be so very badly.

But brighten up m8!
I'm not beating u up about it - we can still b friends :hug:


Aha, now it's suddenly about McCullough?

He's not the only one, many have pointed out the insufficient time to test the vaccines and a host of serious side effects.

Again, has nothing to do with ET
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1126612671268126912701273Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll