I don't believe you are that gullible.
It was a hyper-factional witch-hunt with a preordained mission and outcome. Facts were selectively presented and edited to push a singular narrative. Fed involvement was hidden. Exculpatory statements and facts were not presented. And this was run by some of the worst and most untrustworthy scumbag politicians in the world.

Do you really think the purpose was to 'find facts' and not a bald attempt to sway public opinion for political gain?

Warpigs that starve and bomb innocent children are pretending a broken window, buffoons in costumes and some pushing matches is the new 9/11.
Pretending protestors killed people when they didn't. Insurrection!

I hope none of us actually buy that narrative.

Everyone knows what you are. You are not fooling anyone. At this point, not even yourself.

A pathetic excuse for a man, constantly raging and insulting people because you don't want to think or admit you are wrong. Intellectually outclassed by literally everyone here.
No attempts at honest consideration or making a reasoned point.

Constantly parroting the most remedial pro-government narratives, fantasizing about government disarming the populace, and then laughably calling other people bootlickers over and over with no sense or irony or shame.

You are the angry NPC meme.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jun 11 2022 05:53pm

Leftoids love to exaggerate everything to the point it becomes comical. Looking at someone is considered rape, nazi is someone who posts a fact on twitter, cnn comparing Biden to FDR https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/26/opinions/franklin-roosevelt-joe-biden-100-days-gergen/index.html

They will sensionalize and skew reality just so that it matches their mental disorders

The committee hasn't presented everything yet so we still need to wait and see. However, I think the conclusion was pretty obvious from Jan 7, 2021. Anyone paying attention would inevitably reach the same conclusion and what we really need to know are a few details i.e. how involved certain people were, what requests were/weren't made, etc. We've learned quite a lot from leaks but all it seems to do is corroborate the obvious.

I mean do you disagree with the following statement: Donald Trump wanted to stay President and worked with individuals in an attempt to make that a reality.

If you agree with that statement, do you think something should be done to prevent that from happening again or do you think we have an adequate system?
If you disagree with the statement, what evidence is necessary in order for you to believe such a statement?

eatingpopcorn.gif

Wanting to stay president and contesting the results is normal, legitimate and not a crime. Democrats contest election results all the time.

The overt censorship and secrecy involved and the hostility to election integrity should sketch out anyone.

The system is evil and corrupt and should be abolished.

None of this has any bearing on whether or not it was a show trial consisting of what I outlined in my previous post. It clearly was.

bootlicker uses rage essay full of projections. it's not very effective...

Democrats don't try to undo elections they lose, they concede the race, not encourage their followers who gathered into a mob to riot and attack the place where the concluded election was being certified, especially conspiring with two criminal organizations to do so.

Followers of Donald J Trump attempted to kidnap and murder members of Congress and attacked the police while attacking federal property. There are a litany of crimes that were committed that day to subvert the will of the American voters.



This post was edited by Skinned on Jun 11 2022 06:22pm

'b-b-but it was just a broken window and some minor shoving. this is a total witch hunt, tucker carlson said so' - bootlicker, probably