d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1125112521253125412555001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 7 2022
Gold: 3.00
Sep 22 2022 09:59am
Quote (ferdia @ Sep 22 2022 06:50pm)
I am confused. I was asked for a possible settlement scenario. I gave it. what do YOU think would be the most realistic settlement ?



I would imagine they wont even put a number on it.



sir this is a thread relating to the war in ukraine, started by russia after it invaded earlier this year. it is not a thread about UFO's. if you want me to respond, make a separate topic.


All the brightest brains in the world do not rule out and are arguing that extraterrestrials are very much a possibility. Tons of official footage has been released of said "UFOs that aren't real"
It is Russia/Ukraine thread but you went ahead and used "Americans are dumb because they believe in UFOS" as your argument so either prove your point and debunk concrete evidence presented or stfu.
If my ancestors where like you the world would be still ruled by fucking monarchies beheading people for looking at royals the wrong way, you are most likely descendant of some French farmer who 200 years ago said - hey, Britain will never accept United States as a sovereign nation, we should just do what we do best and wave the white flag.

Just so you know UFOS = Unidentified Flying Objects, which what these are. I am not even saying these are "Aliens"

This post was edited by Palasan on Sep 22 2022 10:01am
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 22 2022 10:00am
Quote (ferdia @ 22 Sep 2022 17:53)
Everyone, this is Fender. Ignores what is said and dreams up his own interpretation.


don't do that. it's shameful and cowardly. i asked you a simple question:

in a hypothetical scenario, regardless of real life feasibility, if it was only up to YOU: which country should hold which regions, and who should pay for war damages?

you repeatedly refused to answer it, for pretty obvious reasons. no need to play pard politics now in order to turn this into a personal thing. no need to lie about me in order to start another shit storm and paint yourself as a victim. you don't want to answer that question, fine - i can't force you to. all i'm saying is that it speaks for itself - especially considering the rest of your post history full of lazy bothsidesisms and false equivalences...
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Sep 22 2022 10:05am
Quote (ferdia @ Sep 22 2022 10:53am)
Everyone, this is Fender. Ignores what is said and dreams up his own interpretation. Fender, If you are genuinely struggling, or want to put words in my mouth, why dont you type out what you think i am saying (or what i believe) and i will either agree or disagree with it or edit/change it sothat your question is answered.

If anyone else is able to decipher what Fender is trying to make me say, please enlighten me.

Fender why dont YOU provide YOUR view on how a lasting peace will occur.
(again my view is there will be no lasting peace for decades).


The same guy who is just now saying "don't do that. it's shameful and cowardly. i asked you a simple question:" must not understand how other people perceived his prior comment: "i had hoped you were intelligent enough to recognise this is a hypothetical"

He gets to be obnoxious and rude to you, but not the other way around.
Member
Posts: 56,464
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 578,201.52
Sep 22 2022 10:07am
Quote (fender @ Sep 22 2022 05:00pm)
don't do that. it's shameful and cowardly. i asked you a simple question:

in a hypothetical scenario, regardless of real life feasibility, if it was only up to YOU: which country should hold which regions, and who should pay for war damages?

you repeatedly refused to answer it, for pretty obvious reasons. no need to play pard politics now in order to turn this into a personal thing. no need to lie about me in order to start another shit storm and paint yourself as a victim. you don't want to answer that question, fine - i can't force you to. all i'm saying is that it speaks for itself - especially considering the rest of your post history full of lazy bothsidesisms and false equivalences...


None of them. No country should pay reparations as that was what went wrong at the end of WW1 which led to WW2. No side is blameless in this conflict ergo to put a monetary value of blame on a country would be a recipe for further conflict down the line.

This is my answer. you dont have to like or agree with it.

Quote (Santara @ Sep 22 2022 05:05pm)
The same guy who is just now saying "don't do that. it's shameful and cowardly. i asked you a simple question:" must not understand how other people perceived his prior comment: "i had hoped you were intelligent enough to recognise this is a hypothetical"

He gets to be obnoxious and rude to you, but not the other way around.


I would group Fender into those people that are "Hard Work". If anyone does not understand this position I invite you all to reread this topic from the start. This is normal behavior from Fender. i.e. He is incapable or unwilling to clearly state his own position. He is incapable of viewing a situation from more then one perspective, is judgemental and believes he is right and you are wrong. This is born out when he repeatedly uses the phrases such as "dont bothsideism". This position is unbecoming of a user in these subforums noting (to my mind anyway) the net position of these sub forums is to view events from different viewpoints / positions (noting these are international forums with posters from a wide variety of countries).

This post was edited by ferdia on Sep 22 2022 10:24am
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 22 2022 10:24am
Quote (ferdia @ 22 Sep 2022 18:07)
None of them. No country should pay reparations as that was what went wrong at the end of WW1 which led to WW2. No side is blameless in this conflict ergo to put a monetary value of blame on a country would be a recipe for further conflict down the line.

This is my answer. you dont have to like or agree with it.



I would group Fender into those people that are "Hard Work". If anyone does not understand this position I invite you all to reread this topic from the start. This is normal behavior from Fender.


i'm just ignoring your desperate attempts to make this personal and focus on the hypothetical:

ok, no reparations, regardless of who started the war and who targeted civilian infrastructure in whose country then. understood. second part: who gets the regions in question, who gets crimea? again, regardless of real life feasibility, just according to what you, ferdia, think would be fair?
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Sep 22 2022 10:26am
Quote (Santara @ Sep 22 2022 11:05am)
The same guy who is just now saying "don't do that. it's shameful and cowardly. i asked you a simple question:" must not understand how other people perceived his prior comment: "i had hoped you were intelligent enough to recognise this is a hypothetical"

He gets to be obnoxious and rude to you, but not the other way around.


Sounds like the modern GOP's messaging.

We get to tell you what to do. You do not get to tell us what to do.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 22 2022 10:27am
Quote (Santara @ 22 Sep 2022 18:05)
The same guy who is just now saying "don't do that. it's shameful and cowardly. i asked you a simple question:" must not understand how other people perceived his prior comment: "i had hoped you were intelligent enough to recognise this is a hypothetical"

He gets to be obnoxious and rude to you, but not the other way around.


nice job cherry picking one thing you can take offense in, while ignoring what happened on the other side prior. you truly are an unbiased judge in this, not just an eternally butthurt rand, taking an opportunity at a cowardly cheap shot...
Member
Posts: 56,464
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 578,201.52
Sep 22 2022 10:28am
Quote (fender @ Sep 22 2022 05:24pm)
i'm just ignoring your desperate attempts to make this personal and focus on the hypothetical:

ok, no reparations, regardless of who started the war and who targeted civilian infrastructure in whose country then. understood. second part: who gets the regions in question, who gets crimea? again, regardless of real life feasibility, just according to what you, ferdia, think would be fair?


You made it personal here:

Quote (fender @ Sep 22 2022 04:37pm)
i had hoped you were intelligent enough to recognise this is a hypothetical. of course you can't make both sides happy at this point, i thought that was understood. my goal here is not to craft a realistic peace plan and send you, ferdia, as a negotiator to implement it, i was just curious what you PERSONALLY would consider as fair. i wrote the line about "both parties would be totally ok with it" in order to signal that i don't want you to hide behind feasibility concerns as an excuse. would be great if you could answer this, but a refusal to do so is an answer in itself as well to be fair...

concerning your "peace treaty": that's literally what russia is trying to sell as a compromise and in REALITY it means:


and here:

Quote (fender @ Sep 22 2022 04:51pm)
you gave me your "view" within the perimeters that YOU chose to accept, because it allows you to hide behind what you believe is "realistically" possible, since you apparently don't want to tell me what YOU think would be fair, regardless of feasibility. so by all means, pretend to not understand what i'm asking to repeatedly post russia's idea of a compromise, but don't think i don't realise what you're doing. again, it speaks for itself, even though it's not a direct answer...


(note that you bolded those phrases not me, ergo you made it personal first.)

in answer to your second point:

fairness has nothing to do with it. The word "fairness" should be removed from the question. I also dont understand why you are a dog with a bone on these points ?

"fairness" would mean undoubtedly that eastern ukraine become independent. Thats what ukraine gets for bombing the shit out of its own people for a decade and not entertaining a settlement when it could have.
crimea, leaving fairness at the door, should remain part of Russia for regional stability.

please remove fairness if you are responding to this post.

This post was edited by ferdia on Sep 22 2022 10:31am
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Sep 22 2022 10:33am
Quote (ferdia @ 22 Sep 2022 18:28)
You made it personal here:



and here:



in answer to your second point:

fairness has nothing to do with it. The word "fairness" should be removed from the question. I also dont understand why you are a doh with a bone on these points ?

"fairness" would mean undoubtedly that eastern ukraine become independent. Thats what ukraine gets for bombing the shit out of its own people for a decade.
crimea, leaving fairness at the door, should remain part of Russia for regional stability.


wrong account, chopz. no need to uncritically regurgitate russian propaganda here, completely one-sidedly portraying a situation of targeted russian provocations and meddling in other nations regions as alleged indiscriminate bombing to achieve some kind of ethnic cleansing or whatever you're trying to sell this as, lol.

see, that's why i asked: to remove the mask. now you're hiding behind "there is no fair" again in order to avoid replying to the hypothetical.
Member
Posts: 56,464
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 578,201.52
Sep 22 2022 10:35am
I think thats about enough of my quota of Fender talk. If anyone else wants to have their brain melted by conversing with him I will light a candle for them.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1125112521253125412555001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll