d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1122212231224122512265001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Sep 17 2022 02:13pm
Quote (Djunior @ 17 Sep 2022 08:45)
If that "influencing" didn't happen there would be no conflict right now and no one would care about "Vlad the man", can't you see how frikkin dumb your are?

Now go cry more you pos multi, bout time your new account gets slammed just like your previous one.


Russia/USSR leaders dont give a damn about their citizens. A country rich in natural resources should be heaven for its citizens, like Norway where people are rich as fuck and they dont want to enter EU so they dont have to hang out with "poor" western countries.
Instead the Russia leaders only focus on building empire, by conquest.
People dont want to be slaves in their country, dont want to be merely a tool for building an empire, dont want to be used as conscripts in the offensive wars.
They want to live western style life, where people enjoy life.
Thats why people/countries leave Russia/USSR, whenever they get a chance.
USA doesnt have to trigger protests, or persuade people, people persuade themselves when they travel or hear stories about people who went abroad.
its enough if USA says "hey, we support rising democrasies around the world, if you want to hop in come on".
Member
Posts: 16,002
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Sep 17 2022 02:26pm
Quote (Ironfister @ Sep 17 2022 10:13pm)
Russia/USSR leaders dont give a damn about their citizens. A country rich in natural resources should be heaven for its citizens, like Norway where people are rich as fuck and they dont want to enter EU so they dont have to hang out with "poor" western countries.
Instead the Russia leaders only focus on building empire, by conquest.
People dont want to be slaves in their country, dont want to be merely a tool for building an empire, dont want to be used as conscripts in the offensive wars.
They want to live western style life, where people enjoy life.
Thats why people/countries leave Russia/USSR, whenever they get a chance.
USA doesnt have to trigger protests, or persuade people, people persuade themselves when they travel or hear stories about people who went abroad.
its enough if USA says "hey, we support rising democrasies around the world, if you want to hop in come on".


According to you world-wide energy crisis, world-wide food crisis, countries potentially going broke and a war that could turn into WW3 is worth this?

Nah I'll pass, and you'll see that more and more people will start realizing what's going on here and that it aint worth it just like Vietnam wasn't worth it and Afghanistan wasn't worth it.
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Sep 17 2022 02:28pm
Quote (Ironfister @ Sep 17 2022 10:13pm)
Russia/USSR leaders dont give a damn about their citizens. A country rich in natural resources should be heaven for its citizens, like Norway where people are rich as fuck and they dont want to enter EU so they dont have to hang out with "poor" western countries.
Instead the Russia leaders only focus on building empire, by conquest.
People dont want to be slaves in their country, dont want to be merely a tool for building an empire, dont want to be used as conscripts in the offensive wars.
They want to live western style life, where people enjoy life.
Thats why people/countries leave Russia/USSR, whenever they get a chance.
USA doesnt have to trigger protests, or persuade people, people persuade themselves when they travel or hear stories about people who went abroad.
its enough if USA says "hey, we support rising democrasies around the world, if you want to hop in come on".


so called leaders or elites never cared about regular people and never will

resources can be both a blessing and a curse, you can cash in big or they might even be in the way of development, because its easy money

i think russia is in the second category, while norway would be rich regardless

venezuela should look like dubai and its a shithole, the guys in dubai were smart and managed their stuff in the right way

russia with its size, culture/society and diversity has always been the ultimate playground for corrupt scumbags
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Sep 17 2022 02:55pm
Quote (ferdia @ 15 Sep 2022 23:44)
(...)

Again, this is quite simple: The pro-EU / pro-Russia demographics of the country were split geographically. Kiev is situated deep in the pro-EU areas. The people there overwhelming opposed the regime that was elected democratically by the will of the entire country. They rioted, they overthrew the government by force in a violent coup. The people who had elected Yanukovych lived largely in the east, where he was a former governor of the most populous oblast. The majority of Ukrainians were represented by him in a democracy, they were disenfranchised when the minority overthrew the democracy
You cannot rationalize this as some legislative gridlock or will of the overwhelming majority of the people. It was a textbook violent coup that overthrew a government, full stop.

Democracies, Ukrainian and American alike, have civil recourses and safety valves and separations of powers built into them. If you don't like the last guy who got elected, you can vote against him in the next election. That's how a democracy works.
Overthrowing a government you disagree with, by force, is a coup. And when the CIA gets involved and micromanages it, we can call it a CIA coup.


Its hard to speak about democracy when your president reveals himself as a Russian agent :)
Like what can you do? you elected a guy, and he shows up as a traitor. What you gonna do?
you let him destroy your country and hand it over to Russians?
In 2013 Janukovycz was informed by his espionage, that Russians prepare to attack in Ukraine.
He ignored it completely, did nothing to protect the country.
Also Ukraine was on a track into EU, yet Yanukovycz cancelled it.

There is now 91% support for EU membership in Ukraine. (source: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/record-number-ukrainians-support-joining-eu-backing-nato-membership-falls-poll-2022-04-05/ )
Its the final proof, 91% is a serious support.
Member
Posts: 16,411
Joined: Apr 9 2007
Gold: 12,059.17
Sep 17 2022 03:24pm
Quote (Djunior @ 17 Sep 2022 22:26)
According to you world-wide energy crisis, world-wide food crisis, countries potentially going broke and a war that could turn into WW3 is worth this?

Nah I'll pass, and you'll see that more and more people will start realizing what's going on here and that it aint worth it just like Vietnam wasn't worth it and Afghanistan wasn't worth it.


energy crisis is not war related. Russians just stopped shipping us gas, possibly to increase prices. They could do it anytime. EU was going green energy, so it was already on a track to limit and stop buying energy from Russia.
Energy divorce was unevitable. And when there is divorce, people (in this case: Russians) stop playing nice. Now the Russians want to make as much money or other influence possible, while EU is still gas dependant.
In fact it was sily of EU politicians, that they werent ready for this.

Food crisis... so you say that 40mln Ukrainians should give up their freedom because they have to feed the world? In my opinion its rather a reason for NATO to accept Ukraine ASAP, because Russian bandits make it difficult to export food from Ukraine.

WW3 needs to be avoided, but you dont avoid the conflict by always running away from it and giving space to invader. Remember nazi germany? countries in Europe let Hitler grow and take their neighbours, yet he was hungry and hungry and it resulted in a war anyway, only it was more difficult because he grew more powerful.
So current war is not that bad for a mankind, I can imagine much worse if Russian empire grows.
Member
Posts: 56,451
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 581,431.52
Sep 17 2022 04:00pm
you have misquoted me again (2nd time now).

This is from Goomshill:

Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 16 2022 02:01pm)
And Ashlee Babbitt was an unarmed non-violent January 6th rioters who was shot and killed by DC police. And those rioters were more interested in taking selfies and lounging around than overthrowing a government.
There was an insurrection and coup going on in Ukraine, blaming the security forces for trying to quell it doesn't rationalize it whatsoever.

Again, this is quite simple: The pro-EU / pro-Russia demographics of the country were split geographically. Kiev is situated deep in the pro-EU areas. The people there overwhelming opposed the regime that was elected democratically by the will of the entire country. They rioted, they overthrew the government by force in a violent coup. The people who had elected Yanukovych lived largely in the east, where he was a former governor of the most populous oblast. The majority of Ukrainians were represented by him in a democracy, they were disenfranchised when the minority overthrew the democracy
You cannot rationalize this as some legislative gridlock or will of the overwhelming majority of the people. It was a textbook violent coup that overthrew a government, full stop.

Democracies, Ukrainian and American alike, have civil recourses and safety valves and separations of powers built into them. If you don't like the last guy who got elected, you can vote against him in the next election. That's how a democracy works.
Overthrowing a government you disagree with, by force, is a coup. And when the CIA gets involved and micromanages it, we can call it a CIA coup.

So here's my question for PARD: Why is getting people to acknowledge reality about Euromaidan so completely different in the public consciousness than every previous CIA coup? Nobody gets their knickers in a twist when we talk about Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua. Panama, etc etc. Why is Ukraine suddenly an exception? They didn't even take the cursory effort to obfuscate their presence and give plausible deniability, they put Hunter friggin Biden and Cofer Black on the Burisma board while Nuland and Pyatt appraised Ukrainian resumes on an unsecured phone line.


and therefore your response should be directed to him, not me.

Also, purely on an aside, your logic here is flawed :

Quote (Ironfister @ Sep 17 2022 09:55pm)
...Also Ukraine was on a track into EU, yet Yanukovycz cancelled it.

There is now 91% support for EU membership in Ukraine. (source: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/record-number-ukrainians-support-joining-eu-backing-nato-membership-falls-poll-2022-04-05/ )
Its thefinal proof, 91% is a serious support.


Briefly, I dont disagree with your logic re: Ukraine ever moving westwards before the war (to the EU) but events (the war) have overtaken us. i.e. Russia invaded Ukriane. For sure the situation now is overwhelming support to join the EU. But this is not a "Final Proof", but rather an arrived position.

This post was edited by ferdia on Sep 17 2022 04:05pm
Member
Posts: 50,902
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Sep 17 2022 04:27pm
Whether Ukraine would have moved westwards is one of those defunct hypotheticals. Left intact, would Ukraine have eventually been swallowed up by peaceful and democratic western philosophy that led to their eventual embrace of NATO? There's arguments for and against. Perhaps popular sentiment was indeed shifting, even breaking into the east. But they elected Yanukovych and he sided with the east. That was as far as we got before their democracy collapsed. Perhaps if Ukraine started showing signs of bucking Russian influence peacefully, Putin would have been willing to invade anyway to stifle NATO expansion. Perhaps their oligarchy would have sided more with Russia on its own. We don't know. The CIA stuck their noses in and micromanaged a color revolution and set in motion the last 8 years.

Now the US talking points are just garbage that require you to embrace democratic jingoism while ignoring that inconvenient bit about us toppling a democracy. We're the champions of democracy, and we'll kill anyone who votes against us! Yee-haw!
like this;
https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/91622-0
bad enough even when you subtract the ban on the opposition and literal nazis.
Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 7 2022
Gold: 3.00
Sep 17 2022 05:08pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 18 2022 01:27am)
Whether Ukraine would have moved westwards is one of those defunct hypotheticals. Left intact, would Ukraine have eventually been swallowed up by peaceful and democratic western philosophy that led to their eventual embrace of NATO? There's arguments for and against. Perhaps popular sentiment was indeed shifting, even breaking into the east. But they elected Yanukovych and he sided with the east. That was as far as we got before their democracy collapsed. Perhaps if Ukraine started showing signs of bucking Russian influence peacefully, Putin would have been willing to invade anyway to stifle NATO expansion. Perhaps their oligarchy would have sided more with Russia on its own. We don't know. The CIA stuck their noses in and micromanaged a color revolution and set in motion the last 8 years.

Now the US talking points are just garbage that require you to embrace democratic jingoism while ignoring that inconvenient bit about us toppling a democracy. We're the champions of democracy, and we'll kill anyone who votes against us! Yee-haw!
like this;
https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/91622-0
bad enough even when you subtract the ban on the opposition and literal nazis.


The question is whether you are such a whiny mangina irl or just online. Your whataboutism rattling is boring af LOL





This post was edited by Palasan on Sep 17 2022 05:11pm
Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 18 2022 10:21am
Whataboutism is a funny rhetorical trick, it allows the invoker to ignore any demand that they explain the grounds of their moral/ethical/political inconsistency.
Member
Posts: 56,451
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 581,431.52
Sep 18 2022 10:39am
whataboutism is a very popular term for people in this subforum. I prefer the words impartial, non-biased and bilateral.

Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 18 2022 05:21pm)
Whataboutism is a funny rhetorical trick, it allows the invoker to ignore any demand that they explain the grounds of their moral/ethical/political inconsistency.


this is untrue, also grounds for position have repeatedly been given, by most users in this thread.

This post was edited by ferdia on Sep 18 2022 10:41am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1122212231224122512265001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll