Quote (Lvivz @ Sep 5 2022 12:11pm)
Its inhabited by ethnic Tatars, ethnic russians are just temporary occupying population.
Not Ukrainians, those tartars speak Russian, the economy there is tied to Russia. A small but important detail not mentioned by any western media:
Quote
After Ukrainian independence in 1991 the central government and Crimea clashed, culminating in Ukraine forcibly bringing Crimea under control. The Soviet fleet in Crimea was also in contention but a 1997 treaty allowed Russia to continue basing its fleet in Sevastopol. In 2014 pro-Russians seized control, organising a referendum supporting Russian annexation, but most countries recognise Crimea as Ukrainian.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CrimeaThey didn't want to be part of Ukraine.
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 5 2022 12:10pm)
I think this rhetoric is more about boosting morale of the troops and keeping the pro-Ukraine residents of the occupied areas on their side. They won't collaborate with Ukraine if they have no hope of ever being liberated from Russian rule.
It might also be in anticipation of eventual peace negotiations. Once the negotiations start, Zelenskyy has more leverage if the Russian side thinks there's a legitimate threat to Crimea. You gotta demand more than your actual price/goals, so that you end up where you want after bargaining and making "concessions".
Don't see how it is productive. From Russian standpoint it means no negotiations are possible with this government so they'll go for the total subjugation of Ukraine.
This post was edited by babun1024 on Sep 5 2022 04:19am