d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Taking Their Guns
Prev1111213141519Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,467
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 475.46
Oct 18 2019 09:52am
Quote (Ghot @ Oct 17 2019 10:11pm)
While this guy does look like a nut case to me... I don't think it's right to infringe on someone's right to bear arms, just because he MAY commit a crime in the future.
Unlike the movie: Minority Report, we don't HAVE devices which assure us of someone's future actions.

Substituting dislike of someone's ideology for the Laws in this country, is a slippery slope we definitely don't need to start down.


https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/02/10/us/10xp-nazi1/10xp-nazi1-videoLarge.jpg







/e It's almost like the left doesn't care about the US Constitution.


Please.. The right only cares about the second amendment and nothing else. That has been proven already.

If someone is crazy they shouldnt have guns. I am all for red flagging someone if there is cause. If they want their gerns they can take a test to prove they are not nuts. Simple.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Oct 18 2019 09:58am
Quote (Brian_D @ Oct 18 2019 11:52am)
Please.. The right only cares about the second amendment and nothing else. That has been proven already.

If someone is crazy they shouldnt have guns. I am all for red flagging someone if there is cause. If they want their gerns they can take a test to prove they are not nuts. Simple.


If you want your freedom you can take a test to prove you're not a moron. simple.

test failed btw
Member
Posts: 1,775
Joined: Feb 2 2017
Gold: 945.00
Oct 18 2019 10:08am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Oct 18 2019 05:58pm)
If you want your freedom you can take a test to prove you're not a moron. simple.

test failed btw


I want ppl to have the freedom to be shot with the gun they are buying.. You passed Brian's test :)
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 18 2019 10:09am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2019 09:37am)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-710.ZS.html

Here's the supreme court case, it holds that when being arrested an officer is not required to articulate to the person the reason for the arrest. I don't think it's much of a stretch to say that this would extend to a traffic stop.


Not having to justify a reason for an arrest is not the same thing as having to justify a stop.
Member
Posts: 15,467
Joined: Sep 15 2007
Gold: 475.46
Oct 18 2019 10:10am
Quote (cambovenzi @ Oct 18 2019 09:58am)
If you want your freedom you can take a test to prove you're not a moron. simple.

test failed btw


You assume the big ol scary gov is going to use the law incorrectly?

Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2019 10:18am
Quote (Santara @ Oct 18 2019 11:09am)
Not having to justify a reason for an arrest is not the same thing as having to justify a stop.


If a police officer doesn't have to justify (at that time) putting me in handcuffs and putting me in custody it's a real stretch to say he would have to justify (at that time) a routine traffic stop.
Member
Posts: 93,003
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Oct 18 2019 10:22am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2019 11:18am)
If a police officer doesn't have to justify (at that time) putting me in handcuffs and putting me in custody it's a real stretch to say he would have to justify (at that time) a routine traffic stop.


for every arrest a cop has to justify the arrest. they have to file a report, they have to take you in and process you. they don't have to explain it because they are going to take you in either way, and you'll know soon enough when you get processed. a routine traffic stop doesn't end inherently in arrest, it doesn't end in processing, and there's no guarantee you are told what you're accused of.

to be clear, i think what you're saying is a big stretch. but i also think that cops have a slew of easy ways to get around the situation altogether and still get the ID if they want it.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 18 2019 10:23am
Member
Posts: 28,886
Joined: Aug 11 2013
Gold: 10,712.00
Oct 18 2019 10:41am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 18 2019 12:22pm)
for every arrest a cop has to justify the arrest. they have to file a report, they have to take you in and process you. they don't have to explain it because they are going to take you in either way, and you'll know soon enough when you get processed. a routine traffic stop doesn't end inherently in arrest, it doesn't end in processing, and there's no guarantee you are told what you're accused of.

to be clear, i think what you're saying is a big stretch. but i also think that cops have a slew of easy ways to get around the situation altogether and still get the ID if they want it.


hypothetical

Cop gives an answer like "you were driving erratic" guy continues to challenge and ask for a 'real' reason. At what point does the guy need to provide ID? Or is it the guy can argue and challenge ad nauseam?

People need to learn to pick their battles. Like why escalate for no reason? What point are you proving? Give the cop the ID and make him feel stupid while he's fumbling afterwards as he can't give you a ticket for anything or make him feel stupid in court. I got two tickets in one stop awhile ago and i went to court for them and the judge berated the cop in front of a crowd and made him feel like an amateur.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Oct 18 2019 10:43am
Quote (Brian_D @ Oct 18 2019 12:10pm)
You assume the big ol scary gov is going to use the law incorrectly?


Why would anyone have reason to believe the government isn't perfect and moral?
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 18 2019 10:43am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2019 11:18am)
If a police officer doesn't have to justify (at that time) putting me in handcuffs and putting me in custody it's a real stretch to say he would have to justify (at that time) a routine traffic stop.


There's a higher legal bar to clear for arresting someone than there is for simply stopping them.

/e that is to say, a cop can stop someone, but he can't simply stop and detain people for no reason. Effecting an arrest however, he HAS reason.

This post was edited by Santara on Oct 18 2019 10:47am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1111213141519Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll