d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia / Ukraine
Prev1119311941195119611975001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 3 2022 01:33pm
Quote (Lvivz @ Sep 3 2022 12:19pm)
Didn't read 90% of your basement fart drivel but if NATO would get involved there would be 2 outcomes:

1) Nuclear War
2) russians getting its ass kicked in so hard, the remains of their grandmothers would rise up and march 20 miles.

At the moment russia is not even the top side in Ukraine, and Ukraine is fighting with 5% of resources russia has :lol:


NATO is already at war with Russia, just not officially. Everyone in the world sees this, including you.

As for Russia losing this war, again this is just extreme cope. Pretty clear to anyone who doesn't mainline Guardian articles directly into their brainstem that Russia is dictating the terms of the fights, and grinding the Ukrainian fighters into bonemeal.

One of the best parts of NATO losing this war is that it should also lead to the degradation of the media environment that allows people to post such dumb takes as yours without feeling alone and ashamed of your own gullibility. Most Westerners even think that they are the good guys of history, that being 'free' to discuss how the GWOT killed 6 million people and displaced at least 40 million more not only absolves them of the guilt for these crimes but perversely imbues their political system with legitimacy because it openly discusses it's crimes.

It's wildly disgusting, and it is coming to an end. I hope to ride a high speed train from Kinshasa to Addis Ababa by 2040, and that will happen, in part, because NATO can't save a county it's been training for years.
Member
Posts: 19,310
Joined: Feb 24 2018
Gold: 9,215.50
Sep 3 2022 02:16pm
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 3 2022 07:56pm)
Ukraine relies on generating outrage and hope in order to keep getting weapons. They know that Western media will never call them on their bullshit, so they're free to accuse Russia of bombing themselves at a nuclear power plant and everyone will just dutifully report it while saying that the Ukrainians need more weapons to stop the shelling that the Ukrainians definitely aren't doing.

They don't have to. We'll provide them with everything we can spare (the combined west).


Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 3 2022 07:56pm)
From what I've been reading, the Ukrainian advances are going extremely poorly. The Russians pulled back, the Ukrainians came forward into that void out of their defensive positions and are being quite soundly thrashed. This may (or may not) lead to a degradation of their ability to hold the current line. If the Russians are able to get past the current line, OTOH, that's really it as far as defensible terrain goes. The rest of the country is relatively flat and gives much less advantage to defense.

Speculations, nothing confirmed yet. Time will tell..
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 3 2022 07:56pm)
As for economic damages, it's clear that the West is in a much more precarious position than the Russians. Sanctions are hurting things in Russia like semiconductor acquisition, whereas in Europe they are hurting the ability to not have grandma freeze to death in winter. Russia is as close as you can get to an economic autarky, they can go for years or decades like this without truly degraded social life.

We can deal with one cold winter but Russia can't sell all of the gas+oil to India. China even tries to sell their gas surplus to Europe, for they acquired more than they needed to.
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 3 2022 07:56pm)
And I think at this point the Russians have been very clear they aren't in the mood for diplomacy with Ukraine, any longer. They see it's not capable of independence from the West in it's current state, and they know the West will always seek to threaten Russian security. They're in it for a decisive victory with an imposed peace, probably.

The only point I totally agree with. If they enter negotiations NATO is going to arm Ukraine to the teeth again for the next time. Russia will seek total victory.
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 3 2022 09:14pm)
I'm not chopstickz, and I wasn't here for the start of this war.

Making strong predictions is pretty dumb, because how this war is concluded (how quickly, how decisively) is contingent on how Russia acts. So far, they've been careful to avoid civilian casualties, which is evidenced by the fact that Ukrainians still have power, running water, sewage, bridges, etc. If changes happen to the Russian calculus in this regard, the direct combat portion of this war could resolve quickly. With the slow approach, it will be a grind until the Ukrainian lines collapse, and that can always be further away than it seems.

Bad predictions came from all sides, and still do. Russia was supposed to run out of missiles in March, then April, then May, then June, etc. Belarus was supposed to invade. Russia was supposed to start a draft. Ukraine was supposed to 'retake' Crimea in May.

I think once the situation is such that the Ukrainians are no longer able to bomb the residents of Donetsk, Russia will be somewhat happy to spend an entire winter slowly killing every fighting-age Ukrainian (which apparently includes sexagenarians, now) that the West goads Ukraine into sacrificing. And people like Lvivz will be happy to spend that time cheering this strategy on this forum, posting pictures of the occasional anecdote of questionable origin to buoy his own spirits.

What matters to me isn't so much that Russia wins, but that NATO loses. The end of Western military and economic hegemony is going to be a godsend for the bulk of humanity that has been stuck under it's boot for the past two centuries.

One logic mistake here, NATO is the winner no matter what the outcome. Russia is going to be depleted economically. The ability to sustain potent military is going to be impeded long term. There's no "winning" for Russia on the table.


BTW, stupid Ukrainian commanders shelled the nuclear plant again while the inspectors were in there today. Electricity current was interrupted, emergency generators powered the plant during that time. I mean come on that's your country, soil, mother-/fatherland. Why do you force a second Tchernobyl, wasn't one enough?
Quote
Stromleitung durch ukrainischen Beschuss unterbrochen

Ukrainische Einheiten haben in der Nacht zum Samstag nach Angaben eines von Russland anerkannten Verwaltungsvertreters in der Region Saporischschja das gleichnamige AKW mehrmals unter Feuer genommen. Eine wichtige Stromleitung sei dadurch unterbrochen worden, erklärt Wladimir Rogow. Deswegen seien Notstromaggregate aktiviert worden. Der Chef der Internationalen Atomenergiebehörde IAEA, Rafael Grossi, teilte Freitagabend an seiner Rückkehr aus Saporischschja mit, die Anlage des größten europäischen AKWs sei durch die Kämpfe mehrmals beschädigt worden.

https://www.bild.de/news/2022/news/russland-krieg-gegen-ukraine-aktuell-im-liveticker-79328978.bild.html#631385ba14af9709eecbcbfa

EDIT: The plant is still being powered by emergency generators..

This post was edited by babun1024 on Sep 3 2022 02:23pm
Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 3 2022 02:29pm
Quote (babun1024 @ Sep 3 2022 01:16pm)
We can deal with one cold winter but Russia can't sell all of the gas+oil to India. China even tries to sell their gas surplus to Europe, for they acquired more than they needed to.


Well, I disagree that Europe can 'deal with' a single cold winter, but maybe it depends on what one means by 'deal with'.

And yes, Russia can sell all it's oil to China and India, because oil is a limited, fungible resource. OPEC has said that increases in deliveries from Russia or Iran will be met with production cuts, so the total supply on the world market doesn't seem set to increase. Either Russia can sell it's petroleum products and directly or indirectly sell to Europe or alleviate enough demand elsewhere that Europe can purchase non-Russian supplies, or Europe's lights go out.

China doesn't *try* to sell their 'gas surplus' to Europe, it *does* sell it's gas surplus from Europe. And they aren't doing it because "they acquired more than they needed to", they're doing it because Europe positively *requires* that gas, but sanctions prevent them from purchasing from Russia directly. So China buys the gas at a discount, sells it to Europe at a markup, and gets a sizable, reliable wealth transfer from Europe to China.

This isn't China going "oops, we bought too much!" this is Europe paying out the nose for an unnecessary middle man because it imposed a sanctions regime that it didn't understand it couldn't afford to impose.

I'm not a Zero Hedge guy, but this is a worthwhile writeup of the situation: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/china-aggressively-reselling-russian-gas-europe

Quote (babun1024 @ Sep 3 2022 01:16pm)
One logic mistake here, NATO is the winner no matter what the outcome. Russia is going to be depleted economically. The ability to sustain potent military is going to be impeded long term. There's no "winning" for Russia on the table.


Disagree. We've already seen, I think, that NATO states are unable to supply enough weapons to Ukraine. This article is worth a read: https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/return-industrial-warfare

Quote
Presently, the US is decreasing its artillery ammunition stockpiles. In 2020, artillery ammunition purchases decreased by 36% to $425 million. In 2022, the plan is to reduce expenditure on 155mm artillery rounds to $174 million. This is equivalent to 75,357 M795 basic ‘dumb’ rounds for regular artillery, 1,400 XM1113 rounds for the M777, and 1,046 XM1113 rounds for Extended Round Artillery Cannons. Finally, there are $75 million dedicated for Excalibur precision-guided munitions that costs $176K per round, thus totaling 426 rounds. In short, US annual artillery production would at best only last for 10 days to two weeks of combat in Ukraine. If the initial estimate of Russian shells fired is over by 50%, it would only extend the artillery supplied for three weeks.

The US is not the only country facing this challenge. In a recent war game involving US, UK and French forces, UK forces exhausted national stockpiles of critical ammunition after eight days.

Unfortunately, this is not only the case with artillery. Anti-tank Javelins and air-defence Stingers are in the same boat. The US shipped 7,000 Javelin missiles to Ukraine – roughly one-third of its stockpile – with more shipments to come. Lockheed Martin produces about 2,100 missiles a year, though this number might ramp up to 4,000 in a few years. Ukraine claims to use 500 Javelin missiles every day.


As for economically, we'll see. America isn't being as wrecked as Europe is, yet, but overall we're seeing a potential catastrophe. Germany is now posting it's first trade deficits in decades, UK businesses and people are seeing literally 10x increases in their energy bills, etc.

Nah, NATO is showing it's ass, here.

This post was edited by kusotarre1 on Sep 3 2022 02:35pm
Member
Posts: 19,310
Joined: Feb 24 2018
Gold: 9,215.50
Sep 3 2022 02:31pm
Quote (kusotarre1 @ Sep 3 2022 10:29pm)
Well, I disagree that Europe can 'deal with' a single cold winter, but maybe it depends on what one means by 'deal with'.

And yes, Russia can sell all it's oil to China and India, because oil is a limited, fungible resource. OPEC has said that increases in deliveries from Russia or Iran will be met with production cuts, so the total supply on the world market doesn't seem set to increase. Either Russia can sell it's petroleum products and directly or indirectly sell to Europe or alleviate enough demand elsewhere that Europe can purchase non-Russian supplies, or Europe's lights go out.

China doesn't *try* to sell their 'gas surplus' to Europe, it *does* sell it's gas surplus from Europe. And they aren't doing it because "they acquired more than they needed to", they're doing it because Europe positively *requires* that gas, but sanctions prevent them from purchasing from Russia directly. So China buys the gas at a discount, sells it to Europe at a markup, and gets a sizable, reliable wealth transfer from Europe to China.

This isn't China going "oops, we bought too much!" this is Europe paying out the nose for an unnecessary middle man because it imposed a sanctions regime that it didn't understand it couldn't afford to impose.

I'm not a Zero Hedge guy, but this is a worthwhile writeup of the situation: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/china-aggressively-reselling-russian-gas-europe

We aren't buying from China for that reason. There is no sale and markup. That gas just costs money for storage in China. This is why they've got that "surplus". They thought they could sell to us.
Even if Russia diverted all of its Gas production to China and India, that would hardly make 1/3 of European consumption. They're losing a gold mine right now.

This post was edited by babun1024 on Sep 3 2022 02:35pm
Member
Posts: 50,895
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,836.00
Sep 3 2022 02:35pm
I'm a Ukrainian soldier, and I've accepted my death
So it must be for those who tread the path of war.
By Artem Chekh SEPTEMBER 2, 2022

Recently, one of the companies in our battalion returned from a mission in eastern Ukraine. When we saw our comrades a month earlier, they were smiling and cheerful. Now they don't even talk to each other, never take off their bulletproof vests and don't smile at all. Their eyes are empty and dark like dry wells. These fighters lost a third of their personnel, and one of them said that he would rather be dead because now he is afraid to live.

I used to think I had seen enough deaths in my life. I served on the front line in the Donbas for almost a year in 2015-16, and I witnessed numerous tragedies. But in those days the scale of losses was completely different, at least where I was. Each death was carefully fixed, investigations were conducted, we knew most of the names of the killed soldiers, and their portraits were published on social networks.

This is another kind of war, and the losses are, without exaggeration, catastrophic. We no longer know the names of all the dead: There are dozens of them every day. Ukrainians constantly mourn those lost; there are rows of closed coffins in the central squares of relatively calm cities across the country. Closed coffins are the terrible reality of this cruel, bloody and seemingly endless war.

I too have my dead. In the course of the conflict, I've learned of the deaths of various friends and acquaintances, people I had worked with or people I'd never met in person but with whom I maintained friendships on social networks. Not all these people were professional soldiers, but many could not help but take up arms when Russia invaded Ukraine.

I read obituaries on Facebook every day. I see familiar names and think that these people should continue writing reports and books, working in scientific institutes, treating animals, teaching students, raising children, baking bread and selling air conditioners. Instead they go to the front, get wounded, develop severe PTSD and die.

One of the biggest recent blows for me was the death of the journalist Oleksandr Makhov. He already had some military experience, and knowing Oleksandr's fearlessness and courage, I followed him attentively online. I used to visit his Facebook page and was happy to see new posts: They showed he was alive. I focused on his life as if it were a beacon in a stormy sea. But then Oleksandr was killed, and everything fell apart. One by one, I got the news about the deaths of those I knew.

I forbade myself to believe that I and the people I love or like will survive. It is hard to exist in this state, yet accepting the possibility of one's own death is necessary for every soldier. I started thinking about it back in 2014 when, not yet holding a weapon in my hands, I already sensed that one day I would be able to wield one — and so it proved. In the 10 months I spent on the front line near Popasna, in the Luhansk region, I thought often about death. I could feel its quiet steps and calm breathing next to me. But something told me no, not this time.

Now, who knows? Currently my service takes place on the northern border, where I patrol part of the Chernobyl exclusion zone. It is safer here than in the east or south, although the proximity of the autocratic Belarusian leader takes a psychological toll. Our unit's task is to prevent a repeat of the events of March, when the northern part of the Kyiv region was occupied and the enemy shelled the outskirts of the capital with artillery.

I'm ready to get into any hot spot. There is no fear. There is no silent horror as there was in the beginning, when my wife and son were hiding in the hallway of our Kyiv apartment trying to somehow calm down or even fall asleep amid the excruciating howling of air alarms and explosions. There is sadness, of course: More than anything in the world I just want to be with my wife, who is still in Kyiv with my son. I want to live with them, not die somewhere on the front line. But I have accepted the possibility of my death as an almost accomplished fact. Crossing this Rubicon has calmed me down, made me braver, stronger, more balanced. So it must be for those who consciously tread the path of war.

The death of civilians, especially children, is a completely different matter. And no, I don't mean that the life of a civilian is more valuable than the life of a military person. But it is a little more difficult to be prepared for the death of an ordinary Ukrainian who was going about her life and was suddenly killed by Russian roulette. It is also impossible to be prepared for brutal tortures, mass graves, mutilated children, dead bodies buried in the courtyards of apartment buildings, and missile attacks on residential areas, theaters, museums, kindergartens and hospitals.

How to prepare yourself for the thought that the mother of two children who hid in a basement for a month slowly passed away before their eyes? How to accept the death of a 6-year-old girl who died of dehydration under the ruins of her house? How should we react to the fact that some people in the country, as in occupied Mariupol, are forced to eat pigeons and drink water from puddles at the risk of catching cholera?

To quote Kurt Vonnegut, "even if wars didn't keep coming like glaciers, there would still be plain old death." But encounters with death could be very different. We want to believe that we and our beloved ones, the modern people of the 21st century, no longer have to die from medieval barbaric torture, epidemics or detention in concentration camps. That's part of what we're fighting for, the right not only to a dignified life but also to a dignified death.

Let us, the people of Ukraine, wish ourselves a good death — in our own beds, for example, when the time comes. And not when a Russian missile hits our house at dawn.

Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 3 2022 02:40pm
Quote (babun1024 @ Sep 3 2022 01:31pm)
We aren't buying from China for that reason. There is no sale and markup. That gas just costs money for storage in China. This is why they've got that "surplus". They thought they could sell to us.
Even if Russia diverted all of its Gas production to China and India, that would hardly make 1/3 of European consumption. They're losing a gold mine right now.


I don't think you understand. Energy isn't something you can just go into a supermarket and buy like it's magically on the shelf.

Russia is posting record O&G profits despite a slowdown in gross exports because a shortage of supplies increases prices.
Member
Posts: 765
Joined: Aug 25 2022
Gold: 2,602.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 3 2022 02:47pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 3 2022 01:35pm)
I'm a Ukrainian soldier, and I've accepted my death
So it must be for those who tread the path of war.


This guy isn't some stoic soldier dying for glory, he's a meatshield that might die because Ukraine's puppet government refused to implement Minsk or Minsk II, instead choosing to fight a much stronger enemy while chickenshit paper tiger NATO hides behind it handing them ever more scarce weapons.

This cuck is dying for for Victoria Nuland's dreams, utterly pathetic.
Member
Posts: 1,628
Joined: Jan 9 2009
Gold: 1,204.00
Sep 3 2022 03:21pm
In 15-30 years Russia is going to be a Chinese province. bether start worshiping their new overlords..
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Sep 3 2022 04:28pm
Quote (Tapir @ Sep 3 2022 02:21pm)
In 15-30 years Russia is going to be a Chinese province. bether start worshiping their new overlords..


I think you mean months.
Member
Posts: 8,545
Joined: Oct 4 2021
Gold: 281.64
Sep 3 2022 04:37pm
Quote (vladik125rus @ 25 Jan 2022 02:37)
That's all, American propaganda, there is no invasion and there won't be.


still cracks me up to read this.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1119311941195119611975001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll