d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Covid 19 Vaccine
Prev1119011911192119311941250Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 52,044
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Jan 31 2023 01:30pm
Quote (Melatonina @ Jan 31 2023 10:54am)
Try science and not meaningless phraseologie for once.

We're talking about health of people so be precise.
How do you think it is safe ? Like 1% of gene therapized people experienced side effects ? less ? or more ? if yes, how much ? do you have an idea or just assuming it's low ?


Lol, gene therapy.

https://www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk/blog/why-mrna-vaccines-arent-gene-therapies/

Quote (TiStuff @ Jan 31 2023 12:20pm)
WTF KINDA HORSESHIT IS "generally"


It means there can be side effects, but they are generally mild, and less likely to lead to severe consequences compared to being infected with the virus.
Member
Posts: 39,284
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Jan 31 2023 01:46pm
Quote (Santara @ Jan 31 2023 11:30am)
Lol, gene therapy.

https://www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk/blog/why-mrna-vaccines-arent-gene-therapies/



It means there can be side effects, but they are generally mild, and less likely to lead to severe consequences compared to being infected with the virus.


subjective bullchit
Member
Posts: 52,044
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Jan 31 2023 01:51pm
Quote (TiStuff @ Jan 31 2023 01:46pm)
subjective bullchit


So is this comment.
Member
Posts: 16,523
Joined: Mar 5 2016
Gold: 42.45
Warn: 40%
Jan 31 2023 02:20pm
Quote (Santara @ Jan 31 2023 08:30pm)
Lol, gene therapy.

https://www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk/blog/why-mrna-vaccines-arent-gene-therapies/



It means there can be side effects, but they are generally mild, and less likely to lead to severe consequences compared to being infected with the virus.


That's still gene therapy and I dispute what that article claims, that only DNA modifications could be considered as gene therapy.
They're sure trying (too) hard to make it pass as normal vaccine, when in reality our countries geniunely changed the definition of vaccines right before the march 2020 pandemy.
They couldn't call those vaccines without that change, and so people would have most likely rejected them. But you falled for it and it doesn't even prevents you from getting covid 🤣

Again as we speak Japan and all their vacccinated people are filling morgues and hospitals at a record rate. Good job
Member
Posts: 39,284
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 0.69
Jan 31 2023 02:26pm
Quote (Santara @ Jan 31 2023 11:51am)
So is this comment.


wouldnt take a jab on it
Member
Posts: 52,044
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Jan 31 2023 02:32pm
Quote (Melatonina @ Jan 31 2023 02:20pm)
That's still gene therapy and I dispute what that article claims, that only DNA modifications could be considered as gene therapy.
They're sure trying (too) hard to make it pass as normal vaccine, when in reality our countries geniunely changed the definition of vaccines right before the march 2020 pandemy.
They couldn't call those vaccines without that change, and so people would have most likely rejected them. But you falled for it and it doesn't even prevents you from getting covid 🤣

Again as we speak Japan and all their vacccinated people are filling morgues and hospitals at a record rate. Good job


Hmmm. Listen to experts at the NHS, or Melatonina the Moroccan refugee?

Quote (TiStuff @ Jan 31 2023 02:26pm)
wouldnt take a jab on it


That's fine. Don't. No skin off my back.
Member
Posts: 2,243
Joined: Sep 17 2021
Gold: 2.77
Jan 31 2023 02:34pm
i wonder if theres anyone who was turned anti vax by the comments in this thread, then got the virus to subsequently die because of their lack of vaccinations
Member
Posts: 9,372
Joined: May 30 2019
Gold: 69.69
Warn: 30%
Jan 31 2023 02:35pm
Quote (blahaj @ Jan 31 2023 08:34pm)
i wonder if theres anyone who was turned anti vax by the comments in this thread, then got the virus to subsequently die because of their lack of vaccinations


good question.
im however positive there's more people that regret taking the vaccine once it's inefficacy was proven, than people that regret not taking it
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jan 31 2023 02:39pm
Quote (SylvesterStallone @ 31 Jan 2023 21:35)
good question.
im however positive there's more people that regret taking the vaccine once it's inefficacy was proven, than people that regret not taking it


Vaccine was effective, prevented millions deaths. While anti-vax trash only managed to kill people.
Member
Posts: 9,372
Joined: May 30 2019
Gold: 69.69
Warn: 30%
Jan 31 2023 02:46pm
Quote (Meanwhile @ Jan 31 2023 08:39pm)
Vaccine was effective, prevented millions deaths. While anti-vax trash only managed to kill people.


i linked you a youtube video twice, you ignored it both times.
pfizer person saying live in eu parlament how vaccine was never designed or tested to prevent the spread.

keep repeating yourself the shit media told you, that they apologized for as it was exposed to be fake. what a holiday it has to be living in that massive head of urs
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1119011911192119311941250Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll