Quote (IceMage @ Aug 22 2022 06:13pm)
Lol? That's the best comparison you could come up with?
We're talking about the geopolitical brain behind Putin's aggressiveness, a guy who has called for incredible deceitfulness and violence against the West and Ukraine, vs. a discredited media-whore lawyer who is writing books on how the liberals on his island don't like him anymore.
A better comparison would be Kissinger, or Wolfowitz, or somebody with some pull in the US foreign policy field. I'd at least have some measure of sympathy(or at least understanding the logic) if anti-Western zealots blew them up. Dershowitz is a nobody.
Kissinger was Secretary of State and the NSA. He is a politician and a diplomat. Wolfowitz was also a politician who held appointed offices. Notably, Dugin is not. He was never within the realm of (ruling) Russian leadership or politics. He had his own stints at unsuccessful parties, but never actually had
power. That's the distinction I'm making here. He's someone who has solely influenced Russian foreign policy through his scholarship, his writing and advice, never holding any levers of government. People hate Kissinger for the foreign policies he controlled during his tenure, for Vietnam and Bangladesh and Chile and Argentina. If someone Chilean held a grudge for 50 years, maybe they'd have a reason to assassinate him. But Dugin did not make the decision to invade Ukraine, he
advocated for it.
Its killing a philosopher because you hate his philosophy
I'm sure if I dug around I'd find a better parallel in American politics. I was also trying to avoid a comparison to any pundit or media personality, because Dugin really wasn't. So maybe there's some foreign policy wonk at a think tank who's name eludes me. But your examples weren't any better
This post was edited by Goomshill on Aug 23 2022 03:40am