They believe every video out there if it fits their agenda but would never believe in peer reviews

people ask for peer review studies, but since they are uneducated about science and such stuff they couldn't understand it if it was presented to them anyways lmao

Remember when Nature published a "peer reviewed" study that was saying covid vaccines would stop pandemy in 2021..

This post was edited by Melatonina on Dec 27 2022 03:09pm

Are you certain they didn’t say that the pandemic would end as covid is now endemic?

Asking for a friend

The phrase "correlation does not imply causation" refers to the inability to legitimately deduce a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or variables solely on the basis of an observed association or correlation between them.

Correlation does not imply causation - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Correlation_does_not_im...

you cant say "Correlation is not causation" cause thats an obvious bullchit, because correlation can very well be the causation, like smoking and lung cancer.

right on stockholms

o? and BTW dont be a peer review zombie
Peer review is not what you think it is. It has been sold to you.
[/URL]

biggest chump peer review play was perhaps "RNA world hypothesis" ................what a bunch of suckers...........
Lets Talk Science. More Specificaly "peer Review"
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=85705074&f=90&o=0

This post was edited by TiStuff on Dec 27 2022 09:40pm

tell him to open a science book so he understand how this shit can't be a vaccine

I’ll tell him the bad news about the vaccine too. He’ll be disappointed but not surprised about your deflecting his question.

Well done for looking it up. However, your Google search would have thrown up any number of references using the shorter version too. Because it really is true.

Does not imply in this case means exactly that. You cannot ever assume causation from correlation. Therefore it is true to say that correlation is not causation.

Why don’t you Google causality too, then you might actually understand why so much of what you assume about this is false

sneaking "assume" in there because "correlation is not causation" doesnt stand

lol you google it

Tell him his question was non-pertinent.
A peer review study published in the most respectable science journal was saying transmission and so the pandemy would ends, instead it's the complete reverse situation that is happening (see Japan stats since vacination summer 2021)
To be precise : it's way more than 1 study. lmao

This post was edited by Melatonina on Dec 28 2022 07:19am