experimental group is already up and running

Again you are mixing up things.

I was only referring to the video you posted earlier that was proven to be a cut. The sick people were really sick and you called them actors.

After being proven wrong, instead of admitting a mistake you kept on going and going.

I am NOT a fan of vaccines and I never had the vaccine. I am discussing the issue of spreading lies with you in the context of the video you posted about covid actors. It has been proven to be a cut and they were no actors. I mean the same VIDEO explains how they are no actors.

You need to at least admit that.

I do mistakes. I admit mistakes and correct them.

The fact that you can not admit your mistake is just disappointing. I was under the impression that you are a Christian. I would not spend the time to type this if you were not a Christian.

Remember: The Ninth of the Ten Commandments is “You shall not give false witness against your neighbor.” This means two things: “Do not lie when testifying in court.” And, “Do not lie.” Period.

lets talk about lying then.
a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth.
do you believe that is what i was doing/ what i do?

This post was edited by TiStuff on Dec 14 2022 08:50pm

Lol even i can understand what he is talking about. He wants you to stop doubling down on your lie in regards to the video and just admit it was misinformation.

You are deliberately not admitting the video is misinformation

He is not really religious. Why else wouldn't he admit he was wrong?

Btw i don't need religion to admit my wrongdoings

lets switch the question to you then

lying is
a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth.
do you believe that is what i was doing/ what i do?

and lets talk about the two vids I find it an interesting case study. the "full" length vid, where did the information come from that made the first part? did they lie about it or was it already a lie or did they lie in the second part?

So do you admit that your cut version is misleading? Yes or no??

This is what I want to know and I guess wants to know too.

it wasnt misleading if the information was accurate. thats the big question at the moment. where did the long version get the information for the first part? and were they truthful about the first part or were they lying? or is it in the second part.

o? and no weaseling
lets switch the question to you then

lying is
a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth.
do you believe that is what i was doing/ what i do?

So in your world it wasnt misleading to cut the video to seem like the conclusion of it was they were actors. But full video shows they were no actors.

No need to switch to anything you clown. If you can't see why this is misleading then you are blind.

I can not imagine that I am agreeing with an atheist

It is 100% misleading and TiStuff you should be ashamed of yourself.