d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Impeachment Hearings
Prev1114115116117118199Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 23 2019 01:35pm
Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ Nov 23 2019 02:33pm)
He didn't threaten nor harass her. I don't know where you are seeing that.

He said wherever she went, look at how it ended up...she sucks at her job.

The Ukrainian president spoke unfavorably of her. Sounds like an opinion anyone can have about any person.

Can you please tell me where the threat or harassment is?


Which Ukrainian president? The one that was pro-democracy or the one that was pro-Russia?

I don't think you guys have even been paying attention to politics in Ukraine for the past ten years....they've had two violent revolutions and a puppet vassal to Putin in their recent history. So which one? I'm more of a Yulia Tymoshenko fan.

If you're talking Yanukovych then you're basically vouching the opinion of someone who committed treason.

Quote (GLYC123 @ Nov 23 2019 02:36pm)
Exactly.

Trump does talk trash about people. I'm not saying he doesn't.

But a pretty damn significant amount of the Impeachment hearing was revolved around trying to attack the presidents reputation instead of trying to actually show an act of wrongdoing. Which is a last ditch effort. If you had enough credible evidence, I feel that there would be much more focus on that and portrayal of that.


Exactly? How can you say Exactly to such an inexact statement?

Which president said she sucked?

This post was edited by Skinned on Nov 23 2019 01:39pm
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 23 2019 01:36pm
Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ Nov 23 2019 01:33pm)
He didn't threaten nor harass her. I don't where you are seeing that.

He said wherever she went, look at how it ended up...she sucks at her job.

The Ukrainian president spoke unfavorably of her. Sounds like an opinion anyone can have about any person.

Can you please tell me where the threat or harassment is?


Exactly.

Trump does talk trash about people. I'm not saying he doesn't.

But a pretty damn significant amount of the Impeachment hearing was revolved around trying to attack the presidents reputation instead of trying to actually show an act of wrongdoing. Which is a last ditch effort. If you had enough credible evidence, I feel that there would be much more focus on that and portrayal of that evidence.

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Nov 23 2019 01:37pm
Member
Posts: 39,303
Joined: Mar 13 2006
Gold: 0.71
Nov 23 2019 01:39pm
Quote (Skinned @ Nov 23 2019 02:35pm)
Which Ukrainian president? The one that was pro-democracy or the one that was pro-Russia?

I don't think you guys have even been paying attention to politics in Ukraine for the past ten years....they've had two violent revolutions and a puppet vassal to Putin in their recent history.


New. It's in the tweet.

Not sure what the second part has anything to do with Trump "threatening" or "harassing" her.

Either way, he didn't do either. She sucks at her job and the new president didn't like her. So, opinion. That's the weakest form of "threatening" or "harassing" I have ever fucking seen. Shame on the media trying to make something out of that.

Also, it doesn't matter WHO says it....anyone can say it. The meaning is the same.

This post was edited by ZxFamily-GuyxZ on Nov 23 2019 01:40pm
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 23 2019 01:40pm
Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ Nov 23 2019 02:39pm)
New. It's in the tweet.

Not sure what the second part has anything to do with Trump "threatening" or "harassing" her.

Either way, he didn't do either. She sucks at her job and the new president didn't like her. So, opinion. That's the weakest form of "threatening" or "harassing" I have ever fucking seen. Shame on the media trying to make something out of that.


ok Nancy. Call the PTA and discuss this with other outraged housewives. Maybe get together and write a letter to the editor.

The Right gets all pissed off about BDS tactics, but you can always turn the fucking television off. I never watch cable news, its all retarded and it doesn't surprise me that you guys get all excited about it.

The hearings are justified, and all politicians grandstand. If you complain about grandstanding and support Trump you're a hypocrite anyway and you're opinion isn't worth less than a bucket of cold piss.

Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ Nov 23 2019 02:41pm)
Tell them to turn off CNN


CNN, Fox, whatever. If you like one and hate the other then you're just dumb AF. Real talk. They are the same product tailored for the same people with slightly different tastes. Taste and savor it. If you love Fox News and call CNN fans idiots you're calling yourself an idiot. Grats. Trump went on a Fox show and lied over twenty times yesterday. They exist to sell ads.

This post was edited by Skinned on Nov 23 2019 01:43pm
Member
Posts: 39,303
Joined: Mar 13 2006
Gold: 0.71
Nov 23 2019 01:41pm
Quote (Skinned @ Nov 23 2019 02:40pm)
ok Nancy. Call the PTA and discuss this with other outraged housewives. Maybe get together and write a letter to the editor.


Tell them to turn off CNN

Quote (Skinned @ Nov 23 2019 02:40pm)
ok Nancy. Call the PTA and discuss this with other outraged housewives. Maybe get together and write a letter to the editor.

The Right gets all pissed off about BDS tactics, but you can always turn the fucking television off. I never watch cable news, its all retarded and it doesn't surprise me that you guys get all excited about it.

The hearings are justified, and all politicians grandstand. If you complain about grandstanding and support Trump you're a hypocrite anyway and you're opinion isn't worth less than a bucket of cold piss.


I don't have a side here actually.....this is just comedy to me

But I do like evidence over hearsay

This post was edited by ZxFamily-GuyxZ on Nov 23 2019 01:43pm
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 23 2019 01:43pm
Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ Nov 23 2019 02:41pm)
Tell them to turn off CNN



I don't have a side here actually.....this is just comedy to me

But I do like evidence over hearsay


Every court in the United States lets a jury hear witness testimony. Nothing to feel victimized about here sir.

I agree that eye witness testimony is never good, but I do investigative sort of work and interview thousands of people a year and realize this.

This post was edited by Skinned on Nov 23 2019 01:44pm
Member
Posts: 39,303
Joined: Mar 13 2006
Gold: 0.71
Nov 23 2019 01:44pm
Quote (Skinned @ Nov 23 2019 02:43pm)
Every court in the United States lets a jury hear witness testimony. Nothing to feel victimized about here sir.


Just like the accused gets to look straight into his accuser's eyes....

Right?
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 23 2019 01:46pm
Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ Nov 23 2019 02:44pm)
Just like the accused gets to look straight into his accuser's eyes....

Right?


You don't think Trump can go to the hearings? I'm sure Shiff would love to question him.

If he had anything that would diminish the credibility of the witnesses or demonstrate they are wrong he is free to show it at anytime. Whatever that is is probably with is tax returns lol.

Nixon did way less than this guy. The bar is so low now.

This post was edited by Skinned on Nov 23 2019 01:46pm
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 23 2019 01:46pm
Quote (Skinned @ Nov 23 2019 01:35pm)
Which Ukrainian president? The one that was pro-democracy or the one that was pro-Russia?

I don't think you guys have even been paying attention to politics in Ukraine for the past ten years....they've had two violent revolutions and a puppet vassal to Putin in their recent history. So which one? I'm more of a Yulia Tymoshenko fan.

If you're talking Yanukovych then you're basically vouching the opinion of someone who committed treason.



Exactly? How can you say Exactly to such an inexact statement?

Which president said she sucked?


That's why it's pretty reasonable and intelligent for a country to wait to deliver massive amounts of aid to a country until they can determine how corrupt their new leader is.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 23 2019 01:47pm
Quote (GLYC123 @ Nov 23 2019 02:46pm)
That's why it's pretty reasonable and intelligent for a country to wait to deliver massive amounts of aid to a country until they can determine how corrupt their new leader is.


Do you think that is what happened? I have a bridge to sell you, great deal, in New York City even.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1114115116117118199Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll