d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Impeachment Hearings
Prev1113114115116117199Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 23 2019 12:28pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 23 Nov 2019 18:53)
He's very good at getting away with it though.


if that means that he has an incredibly biased and dishonest followership and party, to protect him from the well deserved consequences of his lies - then sure.

if you're suggesting that he lies in a particularly smart and sophisticated way, playing 7d underwater chess, and therefore gets away with it - then no.
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 23 2019 01:18pm
Quote (proccy @ Nov 22 2019 08:31pm)
by that you mean, he would be a victim in a perjury trap. very mean, very bad people


Quote (Skinned @ Nov 22 2019 08:32pm)
Let's put Ivanka and Kushner on the stand, under oath, along with Hunter.

Lean in and put it all out there.

Perjury trap is what people without honor call lying lol.


Not true at all. Trump is far from perfect. But. Proccy is right. It would be stupid to subject yourself to place yourself in a position, where you would be subject to blanket statements used to push a false narrative, or push you into perjury.

That's just common sense. The media has been pushing false stories and narratives against Donald Trump since day one.

You really don't think they would take his words out of context, or use statements designed to create a false narrative?

The only thing the Democratic party seems to currently cares about is trying to lower his reputation and popularity.

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Nov 23 2019 01:18pm
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 23 2019 01:18pm
Quote (GLYC123 @ Nov 23 2019 02:18pm)


Not true at all. Trump is far from perfect. But. Proccy is right. It would be stupid to subject yourself to place yourself in a position, where you would be subject to blanket statements used to push a false narrative, or push you into perjury.

That's just common sense. The media has been pushing false stories and narratives against Donald Trump since day one.

You really don't think they would take his words out of context, or use statements designed to create a false narrative?

The only thing the Democratic party currently cares about is trying to lower his reputation and popularity.


Leaning into conspiracy theories.
Member
Posts: 39,303
Joined: Mar 13 2006
Gold: 0.71
Nov 23 2019 01:23pm


Dont forget Obama!

This post was edited by ZxFamily-GuyxZ on Nov 23 2019 01:28pm
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 23 2019 01:24pm
Quote (Skinned @ Nov 23 2019 01:18pm)
Leaning into conspiracy theories.


What conspiracy theory? Listen to the words out of Adam Schiff's mouth.

Schiff to witness:
"Do you think Yovanovitch deserved to be fired from her position?"

You realize that has absolutely nothing to do with any linkage between Trump and the Ukraine narrative itself?
So what is the purpose behind asking a statement like that, especially after building up that ambassadors character?

It's obvious intent is to attack Donald Trumps character, push a narrative that he's a bad man with bad decisions on foreign policy since it has nothing to do with the actual impeachment idea. There would be no reason to just ask that question in that manner otherwise.

I really don't know how you can't see this.

This post was edited by GLYC123 on Nov 23 2019 01:27pm
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 23 2019 01:29pm
Quote (GLYC123 @ Nov 23 2019 02:24pm)
What conspiracy theory? Listen to the words out of Adam Schiff's mouth.

Schiff to witness:
"Do you think Yovanovitch deserved to be fired from her position?"

You realize that has absolutely nothing to do with any linkage between Trump and the Ukraine narrative itself?
So what is the purpose behind asking a statement like that, especially after building up that ambassadors character?

It's obvious intent is to attack Donald Trumps character, push a narrative that he's a bad man with bad decisions on foreign policy since it has nothing to do with the actual impeachment idea. There would be no reason to just ask that question in that manner otherwise.

I really don't know how you can't see this.


Was she the one that Trump was threatening and harassing on Twitter when she testified he was doing that to her at work?

Are you consider Trump's own twitter post as unfair coverage of Donald Trump?

This post was edited by Skinned on Nov 23 2019 01:30pm
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Nov 23 2019 01:30pm
Quote (ZxFamily-GuyxZ @ Nov 23 2019 02:23pm)


That's the son of George Soros, not the whistle blower.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Nov 23 2019 01:31pm
Member
Posts: 11,757
Joined: Dec 17 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 23 2019 01:32pm
Quote (Skinned @ Nov 23 2019 01:29pm)
Was she the one that Trump was threatening and harassing on Twitter when she testified he was doing that to her at work?


This is the tweet about Yovanovitch.

"Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a U.S. President’s absolute right to appoint ambassadors."
Member
Posts: 39,303
Joined: Mar 13 2006
Gold: 0.71
Nov 23 2019 01:33pm
Quote (Skinned @ Nov 23 2019 02:29pm)
Was she the one that Trump was threatening and harassing on Twitter when she testified he was doing that to her at work?


He didn't threaten nor harass her. I don't know where you are seeing that.

He said wherever she went, look at how it ended up...she sucks at her job.

The Ukrainian president spoke unfavorably of her. Sounds like an opinion anyone can have about any person.

Can you please tell me where the threat or harassment is?

This post was edited by ZxFamily-GuyxZ on Nov 23 2019 01:33pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1113114115116117199Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll