Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Oct 17 2017 08:25am)
NK is YOUR problem, UN will never vote military action because:
- VETO for China or Russia or France. Basically there will be one that will VETO so it will not happend.
- It's Trump shit and nobody want to be involved in trump shit, only americans are forced (good luck)
- If a "war" start it will be so fast nobody will have the time to vote anything: NK could get completely nuked and usa would eventually lose few millions people if a NK nuke hit 2 or 3 cities (maybe way more WHO KNOW), end of story, blame yourself & RIP.
It really doesn't matter to me if the UN loses all credibility but making an agreement with NK, that NK ignores.
Well, it does bother me. I think the UN was a good idea, and that we (the members) should try to protect it's credibility.
But I guess some Frenchmen, don't feel that way?
I don't believe the US would NEED anyone's assistance, but I shudder to think what the result would be if that were the case.
Kim Jong is starting to hurt, from the sanctions. I think this is what he means by his: "standing by the US" comment. He obviously can't mean militarily.