Quote (Black XistenZ @ 14 Oct 2020 18:59)
you seem to severely struggle with either reading comprehension or basic logic, but being closer to the middle (which already IS well right of the american people when it comes to corporatism and lobbyism) of the court does NOT make her pro-worker, you desperate hack. just because you didn't highlight the "in line with other conservative judges" part, doesn't mean it can be ignored. just because she might not have the most extreme position does NOT mean she's not a guardian of america's corporatist oligarchy. you'd have to strawman my argument beyond recognition in order to consider your post a valid rebuttal.
i mean, i don't expect much from you, neither in terms of intellect nor in terms of honesty, but when you're performing your little act of TRYING to appear as if you were arguing based on facts, you shouldn't be making such easily refutable claims, lol. it's also hilarious how you describe american law as leftward-lurching and ever-expanding when in reality in the last couple of decades protections for women were de facto repealed in large parts of the country, and the corporate takeover of lawmaking has only been fortified by the conservative majority in the court.
the hoops you people are willing to jump through in order to deny the obvious... amazing. even more impressive coming from a european like yourself, who enjoys a whole lot of protections against corporate exploitation than americans. yet for some (cultist) reason you are shilling for american corporatism here.