Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2019 09:37am)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-710.ZS.htmlHere's the supreme court case, it holds that when being arrested an officer is not required to articulate to the person the reason for the arrest. I don't think it's much of a stretch to say that this would extend to a traffic stop.
its a very big stretch. what happens before and after and arrest are a big difference. there is no scotus case saying you have to show ID on a traffic stop when asked.
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2019 09:43am)
So while the stop might be illegal, since there's such broad leeway in establishing a reasonable suspicion for the stop you aren't in a position to reasonably decline showing an officer your driver's license. On the off chance that you are in the right and they really can't come up with any reason to have stopped you it could be correct, but in 99% of circumstances you're going to be arrested for refusing to show ID and be SOL when you try to fight it in court.
in reality in 99% of cases when u ask why you were pulled over the cop answers before you show id or before he asks you to show id. cops answering that question is so tropey that it's commonplace in Tv/movies. not only from the citizen, but the cop. "do you know why i pulled you over today" is standard first words from a cop when they walk up to your window.
this helps deescalate situations.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 18 2019 09:01am