Kamala Harris would be Hillary 2.0, and voters would quickly see through it. It would be easy for Trump to tout his own CJ reform while accusing Harris of needlessly putting thousands of people of color behind bars.

Harris is the typical "all about liberal identity politics, but with a neoliberal, status-quo preserving economic agenda"-candidate. She wouldnt be winning back Obama-Trump voters, and she would be the perfect foe to trigger all those white voters who openly or subconsciously hold racial resentment.

Trump's approval rating is so weak and his behavior so erratic that even Harris would have a fighting chance against him, but out of the available Democratic candidates, she imho would be one of the easier opponents for Trump.

https://amp.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/campaigns/article234268212.html
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/455744-harris-on-bidens-strength-with-black-voters-a-lot-of-that-is-based-on-name?amp
https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=3637

numbers plummeted for Harris with her polling at around or near 1% amongst African-Americans. just because you can’t see through her hypocrisy (locked up people for smoking weed then bragged about smoking weed at the same time, decrying “the rich” while fundraising in the Hamptons) doesn’t mean other people are blind to her BS

Gabbard and Warren (yes that’s right I said it) are superior candidates to an out-of-touch wannabe Hillary

I know she tanked. She is the only one who could face Trump I said. She won't survive the primary.

Don't be so fooled by polls. Sure, everyone knows Trumps says a lot of brow-raising and questionable things, but he's not nearly as unpopular as some would like to think. Remember, Hillary was projected to win in a landslide by the very same polls. At the end of the day, it's the working Americans who show up on voting day that matter.

This post was edited by CarsV on Aug 23 2019 06:38am

Hillary 2 is toast

NOOOOOOOO IT'S NOT FAIR IT WAS HER TURN!!!! WHY DID YOU SEXIST BIGOTS NOT VOTE FOR HER!!

I don't like H Clinton at all. If she had won in 2016... it would have been a disaster.

ok and why? she is less likable and less experienced than the candidate she poorly attempts to emulate

last debate, tulsi smoked harris like the blunts harris would jack from minority men as she worked to get them sentenced to long stints in pelican bay and lompoc during her days as Assistant DA. warren has articulated policy positions (not that i agree with many of them) that capture the progressive wing while still maintaining a presence among center/moderate (D)s - essential for cross-appeal. all harris has done so far is swing at biden - the easiest target to aim at in the primary (loser strategy)

This post was edited by excellence on Aug 23 2019 07:05am

bitcoin?

Primary isn't decided by debates silly.

There are a lot of reasons I'll elaborate on later when I'm not working.