d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Impeachment Hearings
Prev1101102103104105199Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 105,151
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 21 2019 07:09pm


Trump wants Senate trial, expects Joe Biden to testify: White House

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-trial/trump-wants-senate-trial-expects-joe-biden-to-testify-white-house-idUSKBN1XW01S

Quote
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump wants an impeachment trial to go forward in the U.S. Senate because he would receive due process there and he expects Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden would be among the witnesses, a White House spokesman said on Thursday.

“President Trump wants to have a trial in the Senate because it’s clearly the only chamber where he can expect fairness and receive due process under the Constitution,” spokesman Hogan Gidley said in a statement.

“We would expect to finally hear from witnesses who actually witnessed, and possibly participated in corruption - like Adam Schiff, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and the so-called Whistleblower, to name a few,” Gidley said, referring to House of Representatives Intelligence Committee Chairman Schiff, who is leading an impeachment inquiry into Trump.






Fukin eh. :D
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Nov 21 2019 07:28pm
Quote (Ghot @ 22 Nov 2019 02:09)



Kurt Volker, the former US special representative to Ukraine who Republicans called to testify as a witness Tuesday in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, promptly shut down GOP allegations of corruption against the Bidens.

Volker, who served as a diplomat in Ukraine, testified about his involvement in the Trump administration's efforts to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, who served on the board of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian oil-and-gas company, from 2014 to 2019.

One of the biggest GOP talking points in defending Trump against impeachment is that he was justified in asking Ukraine to investigate what he believed to be corruption on the part of Hunter Biden and a cover-up by his father in his capacity as vice president.

But at the beginning of his testimony, Volker shattered that line of argumentation and denounced the allegations of corruption against the Bidens as "self-serving," "not credible," and a "conspiracy" pushed by Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Yes and let's grill the orange🍊

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Nov 21 2019 07:31pm
Member
Posts: 105,151
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 21 2019 07:38pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Nov 21 2019 08:28pm)
Kurt Volker, the former US special representative to Ukraine who Republicans called to testify as a witness Tuesday in the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, promptly shut down GOP allegations of corruption against the Bidens.

Volker, who served as a diplomat in Ukraine, testified about his involvement in the Trump administration's efforts to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, who served on the board of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian oil-and-gas company, from 2014 to 2019.

One of the biggest GOP talking points in defending Trump against impeachment is that he was justified in asking Ukraine to investigate what he believed to be corruption on the part of Hunter Biden and a cover-up by his father in his capacity as vice president.

But at the beginning of his testimony, Volker shattered that line of argumentation and denounced the allegations of corruption against the Bidens as "self-serving," "not credible," and a "conspiracy" pushed by Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani.

Yes and let's grill the orange🍊





No link, ofc. Btw, I watched the hearings on Tuesday.... the Biden issue was NOT shut down. :/
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Nov 21 2019 07:58pm
Quote (GLYC123 @ Nov 21 2019 06:55pm)
Shadow foreign policy for his own gain?

Not everybody agrees with that statement.


Yeah, you're either not informed enough, honest enough, or smart enough to see what's obvious which is why I don't respect your thoughts on this subject
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Nov 21 2019 08:21pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 21 Nov 2019 20:58)
Yeah, you're either not informed enough, honest enough, or smart enough to see what's obvious which is why I don't respect your thoughts on this subject


yeah GLYC123 is dying for the respect of some small-time pale pasty privileged lefty who cannot feed himself without the support of state subsidy or mommie-in-law.
Member
Posts: 50,928
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Nov 21 2019 08:30pm
https://mobile.twitter.com/GOPLeader/status/1197542482927636483


Quote
Calling and questioning of witnesses
(j)(1) Whenever a hearing is conducted by a committee on a measure or
matter, the minority members of the
committee shall be entitled, upon request to the chair by a majority of
them before the completion of the
hearing, to call witnesses selected by
the minority to testify with respect to
that measure or matter during at least
one day of hearing thereon.
(2)(A) Subject to subdivisions (B) and
(C), each committee shall apply the
five-minute rule during the questioning of witnesses in a hearing until
such time as each member of the committee who so desires has had an opportunity to question each witness.
(B) A committee may adopt a rule or
motion permitting a specified number
of its members to question a witness
for longer than five minutes. The time
for extended questioning of a witness
under this subdivision shall be equal
for the majority party and the minority party and may not exceed one hour
in the aggregate.
(C) A committee may adopt a rule or
motion permitting committee staff for
its majority and minority party members to question a witness for equal
specified periods. The time for extended questioning of a witness under
this subdivision shall be equal for the
majority party and the minority party
and may not exceed one hour in the aggregate.


This post was edited by Goomshill on Nov 21 2019 08:33pm
Member
Posts: 105,151
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 21 2019 08:43pm
Quote (Goomshill @ Nov 21 2019 09:30pm)




They brought that up as a "point of order" in the hearing today as well. :D


/e ...so it qualifies under the phrase: "before the completion of the hearing". Nunes did this during his 45 minute time allotment.

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 21 2019 08:54pm
Member
Posts: 105,151
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Nov 21 2019 10:15pm










Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Nov 21 2019 10:27pm
Quote (Ghot @ 22 Nov 2019 02:38)
No link, ofc. Btw, I watched the hearings on Tuesday.... the Biden issue was NOT shut down. :/


It was his opening statement, he said he knows him since 24 years btw on oath.

Now General Piggy Brainspurs want to bring Biden in his mud bath, it's same tactics than North Korea...

Sry typos and good luck cleaning up your country.
Member
Posts: 39,303
Joined: Mar 13 2006
Gold: 0.71
Nov 21 2019 11:32pm
Burisma a double standard for Democrats
Perfect headline

Thats the only thing that’s clear is these hearings

Oh, and the Democrats asking hypothetical questions over and over. Not sure how the answers would mean anything...
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1101102103104105199Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll