What's interesting to me though is that you say you want to convey reasonable points, which I assume is under the intention for an interest in dialogue, discourse, or debate. You're certainly capable of such things.

Yet, you post things like:

You don't get it, cam is an intellectual, if you disagree with him you are anti intellectual.
You need agree with him.

No I aint just mad yo. Your argument was whack.
Defending the legitimate use of force against criminals isn't celebrating criminals.

Its very telling that you think independent thinking black women are putting on shackles and deserve to burn in hell if they step off the democrat plantation and dont push false victimhood narratives.
Decades of propaganda have effected you. Narrow black vs white tribalism. Uncomfortable facts viewed as betrayal.

Oh. I understand now.

A /whoosh on my part.

I successfully defended my position against a completely absurd claim.
You failed to substantiate it and I then declared it over.
I'm happy with that.

I also conveyed accurate statements about leftists that you didnt like to hear.
Im happy with that too.

Oh, it has nothing to do about disliking something I hear. I just find it interesting your approach. I'm just not sure what motivates you to post in PaRD is all.

I'd be curious your response if someone else who had an exchange with you declared that they successfully defended their position, that you didn't substantiate yours, and that it was 'over' and you lost the argument.

This post was edited by Handcuffs on Jun 6 2020 02:14am

Celebrating Trump and Zimmerman is celebrating criminals ya hoser. Candy Owens is a sellout, you gotta be stupid not to realize it. She only gets dem right wing dollars BECAUSE she black and talk shit about brothers and defend murdering black folk. Nothing legitimate about shooting kids, groping women, beating up protestors. Fascist boomer. :rolleyes:

Did fender get budgeting banned?

Unlike your assertions, mine weren't unsubstantiated and unjustified.
The posts are still right there for review. You failed to substantiate a ridiculous claim.

Perhaps I should not have bothered to waste time responding to such a ridiculous notion

Since you were interested, here is some more insight into my motivation for posting:
1. A passion and interest in liberty and politics.
Liberty is superior and preferable to degenerate leftist statism.

2. Mild amusement dunking on particularly bad and ignorant leftist arguments/assertions

3. Clarification for people who might not know what I mean, where I am coming from or why I am right.

The benefit of the doubt that the person is honestly interested and capable of understanding goes out the window after awhile, and there is a finite amount of time I want to spend explaining things to leftists.

The general consensus and evidence is that its a large waste of time trying to reason with leftists,
but third party readers are also a consideration and I don't like the idea of moronic claims like 'private security = government' standing unopposed.