Quote (BardOfXiix @ Jan 21 2018 09:54am)
Corporation owners can and should have the right to regulate their content, as does JSP. If it's a big enough problem, a right-wing Twitter would start because free marketz, right?
We can shorten the name to represent cutting the budget and just call it Twits.
I'll ignore your shot saying "well, your a free market capitalist so you should be fine with private firms censoring opinions their owners disagree with".
Gab is an alternarive to Twitter. However, the service is noticeably smaller. The selling line is they won't ban you for disagreeing with the opinions of the site creator or censor conservative speech like Facebook and Twitter do. This only appeals to a certain market in the social media world. (We can talk about how calling people cunts and making insincere online death threats is much more natural in some circles of the internet, but not well received in others.)
Unfortunately, digital technology results in markets where competition isn't as simple as in other markets. Very frequently, early entries to technology markets are able to plant a flag and dominate a market. Every mp3 player is an iPod, every video game console is a Nintendo. These labels eventually fade, but it takes time. Emerging technologies and services have a home field advantage, to the point where the product itself is referred to by the brand's label.