so, they love manchester. nice. good to know. but are they sorry for the attack? are they sorry for the victims? do they distance themselves from terrorism and djihadism? do they accept non-muslims as equals? are they willing to interact with people outside of their communities?

or are they just a bunch of headscarf wearing guys who love manchester because they can live there in their own, marked out ghettos, getting paid for by british welfare and doing their own thing without having to do any integration into a society whose cultural and social norms they reject?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on May 27 2017 07:14am

Why the fuck should they be sorry? They didn't do it.
Paid for by British welfare? How do you know any of those people are on benefits? How do you know any of them aren't part of multicultural communities?

'distance themselves from terrorism'? Jesus you're fucking twisted. Why don't you distance yourself from terrorism?

so when right wing nut jobs kill some turks here in germany or burn down yet another refugee home, do you organise peace marches? are you sorry for that shit and the victims? do you distance yourself from these nazis and accept muslims as equals? are you willing to interact with refugees?

or are you just another closet racist, secretly celebrating these attacks, hoping your own welfare will be increased as soon as all the lazy, freeloading foreigners will be killed off or sent away, while fantasising about a society where only people who believe what you believe is considered acceptable?

how often are there right wing terrorist attacks in europe vs muslim terrorist attacks in europe?

maybe they are not but the actual bad guy (whose parents were refugees from Libya and this is how he repays the nation that took them in) was:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/26/exclusive-manchester-suicide-bomber-used-student-loan-benefits/

Well islamic terrorist attack happen like 2-3 times a year and that's all around Europe. I don't have statistics on me, but I'm pretty sure that hate crimes on muslims carried out by neonazis are far more common. I know that these attacks are on a much smaller scale, but then again you have to consider that there it's much harder to target a specific group of people than it is to target anyone who is nearby (right wing terrorists would have to put a bomb in a mosque, a refugee center or whatever, and those places are much harder to target than a random pub or a subway station), and also they don't have a professional rich international organization like ISIS giving them resources, training, connecting them between countries, etc.

build a wall arround muslim students loans, irreversible dumb ^^

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on May 27 2017 08:31am

What the actual fuck is with all the accusations of collective guilt?

What legal tradition does that come from?

Why should people who aren't guilty of anything have to do anything to appease you?

This post was edited by Skinned on May 27 2017 08:48am

why? are you just trying to completely evade the question, or is there some kind of threshold you have to pass before feeling sorry?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/22/rightwing-lone-wolves-islamist-extremists-report-thinktank-rusi

Both are motivated by conservative beliefs and the idea that tolerance is bad. Both are motivated by egocentric and immature worldviews.

Islamic religious based terrorism is Right wing terrorism.

The people on both side are exactly the same; two peas in a pod.

Their only differences are regional. The word "Islamofascism" was abandoned because the Right Wing in America didn't like it.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 27 2017 09:00am