Where I'm from, we have a superintendent for every school. And they get paid $400k each. Talk about fucking wasted money.

Is it weaksauce to point out that public school teachers are twice as likely as the general public to send their own children to private schools? (Including 25% of all D.C. and Baltimore public teachers, 39% of Chicago teachers, 44% of Philadelphia teachers...) Gee, it's almost as if they know there's a problem and yet they aren't providing a solution. Teacher's unions are by far and away the greatest roadblock to meaningful reforms.

Give it a rest Santana, you aren't big and you aren't clever

Big? What the fuck are you on about?

Clever? But you are? What's your fixation on calling me Santana? A secret fedora fetish?

Autocorrect

He's used it correctly before.

Those are tough ass communities. For some reasons you think teachers should be in the poverty most of their students live in when they teach in the poorest communities in the US.

You should be rewarded for hard work. If you work hard, go to college, get quality training, and work your ass off for the betterment of society, you should be able to live a nice lifestyle, above people who didn't do those things.

Maybe you just want teachers to leave the harder urban schools so they just die and single parents can teach their kids themselves between their jobs. Just have the big ones watch the little ones.

The point is straight over your head on this one.

This isn't about the money they make, it's about the dissonance between saying public schools are the best and must be defended at all costs (like their unions consistently do), while simultaneously sending your own kids to a better alternative. This is one of those "the hypocrisy is deafening" moments.

1. Charter schools ARE a form of a public education

2. The entire public education system is terrible.

you should be rewarded by the free market, you don't get to put the price value of a doctor over that of pewdiepie just because one went to medical school and one may have not.