That's not an explanation, that's a description. A very poor one and some out-of-the-ass hoopla with no scientific article or experimental supporting evidence.
Astropriest atheism is getting desperate.

1 reference for the most profound ('re)discovery of the 21st century being watered down:
^ "Lesson 1: History Of Refrigeration, Version 1 ME". Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-11-06.



This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Aug 22 2016 03:05pm

are you asking why radiative cooling happens? look up entropy

You have nothing to bring to the table.
You're just spouting irrelevant forces of nature as if they fit, because you cannot be bothered to investigate a mystery.

I can know everything there is to know about entropy and thermodynamics and the ability to refract and converge moon light into a lazer of coldness still will not fit the current "scientific" paradigm.

Reject this renaissance longer, so that the herds of sheep may trample you in your dumbfoundedness.





This planet is sooooo Fucked


This post was edited by MaliceMizer on Aug 22 2016 03:35pm

I don't think you read and understood the page on radiative cooling if you are unable to understand why a clear sky is cooler than a shaded area while having an understanding of thermodynamics.
Moonlight is not intense enough to feel the heat from

Moonlight is intense enough to feel the cold from, and intense enough to ice up the tip of my wet cigarette, when the ambient temperature is 50 degrees on a summer night



Plenty of gnostic mythology calls the moon the first liar & original sinner

You aren't feeling cold from moonlight instead areas without cover are becoming more cold due to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_cooling

that is nice

So items in direct moonlight increase radiative cooling more effectively than items not in direct moonlight, thanks for clearing that up....