There's not a real substantive reason to not allow the Syrian refugees into the country, so I'm fine with letting them go through the rigorous vetting process that already exists. I think it's critical to uphold American values, especially those so central to the very national identity. When you consider all the pertinent facts on top of that core belief (especially that we're equipped to play a role, that we have no reason to suspect the refugees are acting in bad faith, and that we did play a massive role in their displacement), I think it's hard to arrive at any other conclusion.
I'm finding that most of the disagreement is stemming from the refusal to consider those pertinent facts. Some people might not think that it's as important that the country uphold certain values as I do and that's a perfectly valid opinion, but it's still hard to credibly end up with an alternative position given the facts at hand.
Quote (tman65ky @ Nov 21 2015 10:19am)
...Fact of the matter remains that the assholes in Paris used the refugee crisis to put people in place...
That's quite an entertaining post but if I could just highlight this one small portion: that's actually
not a fact. That's at best reckless speculation that's already been discredited. This is the exact issue I mentioned -- we're basically locked in a post-truth political discussion because some people don't know what a "fact" is. Simply
believing something doesn't make it a fact.