Quote (Valhalls_Sun @ Feb 15 2015 04:09pm)
how can you say fracking is a viable alternative? It's bad enough that we are enabling the water on the surface to evaporate but now it's viable to exploit the earth once again by pumping dangerous chemicals down into the water bearing strata that we depend on? If we poison this water that's underground there won't be any other water. It takes between 1-8 million gallons of water for one fracc site that's areound 400 semi-tractor tanker loads of water it takes sand and 600 gallons of chemicals as well some of them poisons, and some of then known carcinogens all of that if forced under pressure deep underground to break up the shale rock. When they're done the water and poison stays in the hole.
This is ignorant fear mongering. Scared of what you don't understand.
Dangerous chamcals big numbers omgerz
The spooky skilenton not being reposted 4 times doesn't make it not viable.
Yes its viable. Thats why we are seeing massive investment and a boom in the industry across the country.
Quote
the rest of your excuse reads like a melodrama nobody suggested violence, or devastating regulations. But something has to be done, and companies in the private sector will not police themselves in this manner because they can't see a direct affect on their business. So for the good of mankind. the greater good if you will. they will have to police the corporations much as they do now with the EPA and the clean air Act.
It's time to take an action and if that means putting some limits on capitalists ability to gather as much wealth as possible , well sorry. There are also people who are dying because of the changing climate. a decrease in a businessman's profit seems to pale when you think of the potential extinction of nations of populations .
I'm certainly not against nuclear power we could use some European examples there again. there are safe clean choices we need to start on now so that we don't have to make a hurry up decision later. Now is the time to work the kinks out of some systems as we steadily grow less dependent on fossil fuels.
This is actually suggested all the time.
People being allowed to do business and thrive is not just about some rich employer you hate. Its necessary to give people the things they desire and need to live.
Now if someone is doing something egregious and doing the equivalent of pissing in someone's cheerios I can agree that should be stopped.
What is proposed is not necessarily that
Quote (thundercock)
Learn to biology. Bicycling=increased heart rate=more CO2 emissions. If you TRULY cared about the environment, you would drive a Tesla.
I thought you were going to say 'kill yourself' but I guess that works too.