accuser: https://forums.d2jsp.org/user.php?i=1159906

topic: https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=89802990&f=241

original bet topic: https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=89597950&f=241

summary:
I post a topic stating a proposed bet at different odds than my original bet with another user. That same user then pm's me asking to add to our bet. I confirm the bet during the fight. I retract the bet during the fight.
The fight ends, I send him the winnings from our original bet, and he is holding me to a retraction even though there are no terms in our bet that state the party cannot retract. The user thinks I owe him on both bets.

pms:



https://i.imgur.com/oMeoWKz.jpg

Can someone please tell me if I need to send fg to this user? I retracted a bet during a fight right after a bet was made during a fight with no clause in the bet that stated no retractions.

This post was edited by TODDZI11A on Nov 13 2021 07:41pm

A man is as good as his word…

retracted a bet that did not have a retraction clause. bet was made during the fight and retracted during the fight.

It’s true… Sadly there is no dumb shit clause also

It's a bit tricky when there is no retraction clause.
However in my personally opinion, a bet is a bet and you made the bet while the fight was started I assume - therefore I would mean that you're obligated to pay.

Pay the man

Did you guys both agree to the bet during the fight, though?

A fight requires a winner (something to be completed)

This post was edited by ChocolateCoveredGummyBears on Nov 13 2021 07:53pm

The bet was proposed, agreed upon, and retracted during the fight. The bet did not have a retraction clause.

This post was edited by TODDZI11A on Nov 13 2021 07:55pm

The bet was proposed during the fight, agreed upon during the fight, and retracted during the fight. The bet did not have a retraction clause.