Controversial one and got wrecked on IPO

Institutional investing seems split on the topic. 35% of their profits are from retail option trading which most of which is gambling , ergo institutions saying this is just an overvalued online gambling company

But clearly there is incentive from their standpoint to make sure tho sticks around and grabs as many retail investors as possible

No position yet. Will look to add some tho if it drops another leg down

Meh, not feeling this one at all. Cathie had to go buy some so.. Guess I'm in for a little at least lol.

I dont think Id ever buy Hood. AMC ape!

+23% today

Didn't they price their IPO pretty damn cheap?

vlad and the boys dumped their shares immediately upon IPO

hell the CMO dumped 100% of her shares - that's a vote of confidence if I've ever seen one lol

Vlad did dump a large amount $ wise but it only accounts for 2% of his shares. CMO dump is true from what I’ve read.

it's even higher in aftermarket, gained $14+ today

This post was edited by KrWWW on Aug 3 2021 07:37pm

Dump and pump.

I dont have twitter but the little boxes pop up when i google a stock ticker and I just googled Hood stock.

This is the first shit I see from a 20 year CNBC analyst.

"$HOOD has already traded more than half its 30-day avg volume of 64.2M shares trading over 39M shares so far today. It is 9:58 am."


This shit just IPO'd any they're comparing the volume to the 30 year average?

What is this. Is this the level of analysis that comes from a 20 year analyst?


Here's a real conversation when I was ripping apart an analyst from an audit firm once

I asked why a ratio changed so significantly, what events took place that resulted in the significant decline.

They said the denominator changed.

I said yes that's how ratios work but why.

They again said the denominator changed.

From that day forward I saw the light. Analysts are idiots.


This post was edited by SBD on Aug 4 2021 08:57am