I voted yes because it is simple, just like i voted yes when previous threads suggested "Game Names". My response however is in reflection to how to adhere to site rules and give out punishment to the culprit, not an unwitting participant.

It is not negative to the Addition of Game names or the removal of Guild Names.... if you want a Guild Only game, it is simple, you just Choose "Guild Only" ... now I am assuming that you can still give a Guild Only game a Title: 1-71 or 35+ Explore&Map etc.

If you can NOT create a guild only run and add group name (or they remove Guild Only option), it would be unusual.

So, this suggestion to me is about "different" people from different guilds to join together and have fun, also adding in the positive that new people can join etc.

I didn't vote because this was 100% my original idea... I recommended it!! ME!!!!!!!

https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=85404133&f=272

J/k- I voted yes of course.

voted yes, if one doesn't want to remove guild name for the group name... just name the group your guild name

I’ll vote yes but: maybe add an icon to the left indicating “for all” or “guild only”.

One you would not need to name a guild only group, and two if you did want to you would call it "Rainbow G/o"

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Jul 28 2021 06:22pm

If you're in a really big guild, there may be multiple g/o groups. I think this feature would be nice.

Additionally, if you were in the same guild as the other player, how would you know the game he created is g/o? Other than him telling you or it's in the title like your example ^

I think it'd be a nice feature to have this icon, but it's no big deal if it's not added. Just an idea *shrugs*

Guild only climbs are coordinated outside of the game generally, i would literally just name it Dignity g/o, and i doubt any guild has multiple g/o's at the same time but if they do.. dignity g/o2

I solo and choose Guild Only because I do NOT want anyone other than my Guild members to join game. It has nothing to do with Game name (title) at all for me. Also, while I am in G/O game, anyone outside of my guild won't see my group game appear.

So, for larger Guilds that are doing MULTIPLE group runs, the members will ONLY see those group runs on top of non-Guild Only runs. As for an icon indicating G/O or not... there is no point to it other than LARGE Guilds with multiple runs, instead of an icon, maybe just have a different color for Guild Only runs in the list, this way you don't need to add in "G/O" into the title name etc.

There use to be a few guilds doing more than one G/O run at a time. Now, not so much.

Believe it or not -- after some serious thinking and a recent topic I made https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=85423739&f=274

I have changed my mind as to the need and efficacy of named games.

Instead of posting the topic, I could have simply named the game for what it is -- Free Well,

So yeah -- The naming could be a very useful addition to the game.

Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks, eh??