and the book is evidence of God but in this one instance in all the world a book is dismissed as evidence. will not be read nuu huh no way. and thats a stupid

Great evidence. The diff between bible and a science book is:
If you destroy all the science books out there and delete everyone's memory, it will eventually re-appear with the exact same rules because its based on reality.

If you do the same to any religion, it will never be done the same way if at all.

you really need to get a grip on that subjective reasoning

thanks for helping

Science is the opposite of subjective reasoning so yeah

try objective reasoning.

Just did but what's the point.

How can science ever stand against a holy book?

no you didnt thats why i brought you correction

by using "science" to prove the contents of the book is false. that doesnt mean that you declare it (subjective reasoning) you have to actually show it (objective reasoning). you also have to show with some kind of solid argument the science you declare and you have to actually show you understand scripture and what the author is trying to convey.
you never do anything like this.

You know i dont have to do any of that simply because you can't proof gods existence. Burden of proof is on religion but you all throw common sense out of window anyways.

There is simply no proof of magic my friend.

Ah and your god told me to tell you



This post was edited by FantasyWorldII on Jul 19 2022 09:41am